Thanks Jeremy Stanley, Anne Gentle and Eric Fried for your perfect reply
on this question. thanks
2017-09-05 20:59 GMT+08:00 Eric Fried :
> Sigh.
>
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/495326/1/www/.htaccess@52
>
> On 09/05/2017 07:30 AM, Eric Fried wrote:
> > Agree with everything fungi has s
Sigh.
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/495326/1/www/.htaccess@52
On 09/05/2017 07:30 AM, Eric Fried wrote:
> Agree with everything fungi has said here.
>
> Per
> https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/service-types-authority/tree/README.rst#n97
> we want the official service type to be sin
Agree with everything fungi has said here.
Per
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/service-types-authority/tree/README.rst#n97
we want the official service type to be singular rather than plural.
And per the doc migration movement, we want the API references to live
at standard URLs based on
On 2017-09-04 12:45:59 -0500 (-0500), Anne Gentle wrote:
> I want to say there are a couple of in-progress patches to clear
> this up.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/495326/
> and
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/495887/
[...]
Only insofar as the service-types-authority change is switchin
I want to say there are a couple of in-progress patches to clear this up.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/495326/
and
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/495887/
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-09-04 11:10:44 +0800 (+0800), jun zhong wrote:
>> Since we merged man
On 2017-09-04 11:10:44 +0800 (+0800), jun zhong wrote:
> Since we merged many patches [1][2] about api-ref doc in manila 3 weeks
> ago. But it cannot display in the Manila developer doc [3]. Does anyone
> have any idea about this? Do we need to do anything else or just waiting
> for automatic upd
