Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] status of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1

2016-09-22 Thread James Slagle
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:47 PM, James Slagle wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2016-08-08 11:47:56 -0400 (-0400), James Slagle wrote: >> [...] >>> I suppose it's also possible that we might be pushing too strongly >>> down the multinode path? Is the general conc

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] status of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1

2016-08-08 Thread James Slagle
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-08-08 11:47:56 -0400 (-0400), James Slagle wrote: > [...] >> I suppose it's also possible that we might be pushing too strongly >> down the multinode path? Is the general concensus in infra that they'd >> like to help enable project t

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] status of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1

2016-08-08 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-08-08 11:47:56 -0400 (-0400), James Slagle wrote: [...] > I suppose it's also possible that we might be pushing too strongly > down the multinode path? Is the general concensus in infra that they'd > like to help enable project teams to eventually add 3 and 4 (and maybe > more) node multino

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] status of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1

2016-08-08 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:47 AM, James Slagle wrote: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> 5 months ago fungi posted: >> >> [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)[1] >> >> About having the discussion whether the existing TripleO CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] status of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1

2016-08-08 Thread James Slagle
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > 5 months ago fungi posted: > > [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)[1] > > About having the discussion whether the existing TripleO CI should itself > follow > our third-party integration model ins

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] status of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1

2016-08-08 Thread Ben Nemec
On 08/06/2016 07:17 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > 5 months ago fungi posted: > > [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)[1] > > About having the discussion whether the existing TripleO CI should itself > follow > our third-party integration model instead o

[openstack-dev] [infra][tripleo] status of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1

2016-08-06 Thread Paul Belanger
Greetings, 5 months ago fungi posted: [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)[1] About having the discussion whether the existing TripleO CI should itself follow our third-party integration model instead of the current implementation relying on our main community Zuul/