On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Nevermind--it's still there. Perhaps I need glasses (or afternoon
> coffee).
>
Nah, the fastest way to find something like that is to send a note to a
public mail list. :)
dt
--
Dean Troyer
dtro...@gmail.com
__
On 2016-02-04 18:17:07 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> I was getting around to taking care of this just now, and it looks
> like someone has deleted the stable/icehouse branch without tagging
> it icehouse-eol first?
[...]
Nevermind--it's still there. Perhaps I need glasses (or afternoon
co
On 2015-12-16 15:35:23 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote:
> That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that
> still have stable/icehouse branches in projects.txt and we care
> about them?
I was getting around to taking care of this just now, and it looks
like someone has deleted
Jeremy,
Thanks. +1 from me.
-- dims
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2015-12-16 15:35:23 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that still have
>> stable/icehouse branches in projects.txt and we care about
On 2015-12-16 15:35:23 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote:
> That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that still have
> stable/icehouse branches in projects.txt and we care about them?
I believe I simply missed it during the stable/icehouse batch EOL.
That was the timeframe whe
That should be deleted, right? Or are there random projects that still
have stable/icehouse branches in projects.txt and we care about them?
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage