On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
[trim]
>> Speaking of which, I propose the networking subteam to start (continue?)
>> having their own meeting as well. There is a lot of
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Thanks for writing this!
>
> On 02/28/2017 03:42 PM, Julia Kreger wrote:
>
>> Greetings fellow ironic humanoids!
>>
>> As many have known, I've been largely attempting to drive Boot from
>> Volume functionality in
ailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 9:42 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Boot from Vo
Thanks for writing this!
On 02/28/2017 03:42 PM, Julia Kreger wrote:
Greetings fellow ironic humanoids!
As many have known, I've been largely attempting to drive Boot from
Volume functionality in ironic over the past two years. Largely, in a
slow incremental approach, which is in part due to
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Boot from Volume meeting?
>
> Greetings fellow ironic humanoids!
>
> As many have known, I've been largely attempting to drive Boot from
> Volume function
Hey Julia,
I like the idea of a using the old neutron/ironic meeting time as
general purpose meeting time slot. As the usage of the meeting changes,
would new the same meeting name and agenda page be used, or would
subteams rename the meeting and create a new agenda page? Personally I
would
Greetings fellow ironic humanoids!
As many have known, I've been largely attempting to drive Boot from
Volume functionality in ironic over the past two years. Largely, in a
slow incremental approach, which is in part due to how I perceived it
to best fit into the existing priorities when the