Jim, Devananda, and Ironicers
Thanks for your all coordination and efforts to have the fruitful meeting.
I was very glad to see Ironicers in face to face beyond a year finally.
Related to the priority, generally speaking, priority should be based on a
certain vision.
And I had an opportunity to present our vision to the OpenStack community
widely in the summit.
"Ironic Towards Truly Open and Reliable, Eventually for Mission Critical"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpSqDA3jo0I
http://www.slideshare.net/naohirot/ironic-towards-truly-open-and-reliable-eventually-for-mission-critical
I think, however, most of Ironicers were attending to the Ironic work
session which was held in parallel.
So let me ask Ironicers some comment or feedback about the vision I
presented at this time since most of Ironicers are supposed to get back to
work from this week.
Basically I'd like to know what you thought :-)
Thanks.
--
Naohiro Tamura
Fujitsu Limited
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Jim Rollenhagen
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I posted a review to add our Mitaka priorities to our specs repo:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241223/
>
> Ruby made a good point that not everyone was at the summit and she'd
> like buyoff on the patch from all cores before we land it. I tend to
> agree, so I ask that cores that were not in the planning session please
> review this ASAP.
>
> There are some cores that were there and still in Tokyo, so in the
> interest of landing this quickly, I'm okay with moving forward without
> them.
>
> Thanks!
>
> // jim
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev