On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 07:43 PM, Mario Villaplana wrote:
>
>>
>>
>
> - What's been your most frustrating or difficult experience with ironic?
>>
>
> I wanted to suggest this ^^^ question as well, thanks Mario.
>
FYI, this is
On 01/04/2017 07:43 PM, Mario Villaplana wrote:
Hi,
Here are some questions I've thought of:
TESTING / INTERESTED
- What is your use case for ironic?
- What, if anything, is preventing you from using ironic in a
production environment?
- What alternatives to ironic have you considered?
USING
Hello,
I would like to use this opportunity upcoming to decide things related to
one of features that I am implementing.
To prevent lost-update problem, the user in the next Ironic API versions
will have the ability to use the entity tag for each resource.
Thus, in order to send conditional
One thought I had. And it may not be appropriate:
Do you use or have you considered using Ironic for non X86 based systems
(arm, powerpc, etc)?
Are you in the telecom industry? Should Ironic support ATCA based systems
to make use of older hardware?
I am facing a potential project in the next few
Hi,
Here are some questions I've thought of:
TESTING / INTERESTED
- What is your use case for ironic?
- What, if anything, is preventing you from using ironic in a
production environment?
- What alternatives to ironic have you considered?
USING
- What new features would you like to see added
Hi,
from my part, if it would be appropriate, I'd like to use this opportunity
to estimate the iPXE adoption.
So the question targeting those USING and TESTING ironic would be:
- does the hardware you are managing with ironic support iPXE?
- do you use ironic with iPXE enabled?
Hey all,
We have an opportunity to ask a question on the upcoming User Survey,
which will launch by February 1st. We can choose the audience to direct
the question to, choosing from those USING, TESTING, or INTERESTED
in Ironic (or some combination of these).
The hope is that the Foundation