On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:37 PM Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 10 June 2015 at 04:01, Michael Krotscheck krotsch...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it looks like everyone has disqualified jslint and jshint, so let's
just make a decision there and remove them from the running.
On 11 June 2015 at 03:29, Michael Krotscheck krotsch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:37 PM Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
There are two package managers in the JavaScript world right now, one that
focuses on node.js/server dependencies (karma, lint, express,
: [openstack-dev] [javascript] Linters
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:37 PM Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netmailto:robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 10 June 2015 at 04:01, Michael Krotscheck
krotsch...@gmail.commailto:krotsch...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it looks like everyone has disqualified
Hey there, Gustavo-
JSMin's a minifier, not a linter, yes? Unless I'm wrong, we're discussing
the enforcement of code style rather than the concatenation step in our
build, and thus jsmin's not really in the running. Once we _do_ talk about
how we assemble javascript, I'm sure JSMin will have a
Well, it looks like everyone has disqualified jslint and jshint, so let's
just make a decision there and remove them from the running. Unless I hear
a compelling reason to use something that has the infamous do no evil
license in it, let's dump it.
The John Papa styles seem sane, and though I
The more I think about this, the more I think my ideas are dumb.
John Papa has very opinionated guides on how an _angular_ application
should be structured. Openstack's linting must be framework agnostic,
because we can't predict which frameworks may or may not be used. For
example, there is a
On 10 June 2015 at 04:01, Michael Krotscheck krotsch...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it looks like everyone has disqualified jslint and jshint, so let's
just make a decision there and remove them from the running. Unless I hear a
compelling reason to use something that has the infamous do no evil
We¹ve adopted the John Papa style guide for Angular in horizon [0]. On
cursory inspection ES lint seems to have an angular specific plugin [1]
that could be very useful to us, but we¹d need to evaluate it in depth. It
looks like there was some discussion on the style guide on this not too
long ago
On 2015-06-06 03:26, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
Right now, there are several JS linters in use in OpenStack: JSHint,
JSCS, and Eslint. I really would like to only use one of them, so that I
can figure out how to sanely share the configuration between projects.
Can all those who have a strong
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 07:26:24PM +, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
Right now, there are several JS linters in use in OpenStack: JSHint, JSCS,
and Eslint. I really would like to only use one of them, so that I can
figure out how to sanely share the configuration between projects.
Can all
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:59 AM Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com wrote:
jshint: still non-free license [1]
Yep! Ergo, we can't really use it.
eslint seems to require to sign a CLA, if we come across an issue and
were going to fix that.
So does the python foundation, I'm not really
Right now, there are several JS linters in use in OpenStack: JSHint, JSCS,
and Eslint. I really would like to only use one of them, so that I can
figure out how to sanely share the configuration between projects.
Can all those who have a strong opinion please stand up and state their
opinions?
12 matches
Mail list logo