Hi Adam
prior art is the publish-subscribe mechanism. I dont know if Keystone
already has this implemented or not, or if Python implementation exists
or not, without doing some research
regards
David
On 16/03/2015 18:08, Sumit Naiksatam wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Adam Young
On 03/16/2015 03:24 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-03-16 14:17:16 -0400:
On 03/16/2015 01:45 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
All of these are reasons we have so far resisted building a service to
deploy updates to oslo.config's input files, and rely on
- Original Message -
From: Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 8:59:17 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][congress][group-policy] Fetching
policy from a remote source
On 03/16/2015 03:24 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
Oslo policy has been released as a stand alone library. This is great, in
that the rules engine is relatively non-applicaition specific, and I assume
that all of the policy based project are planning to migrate over to
Oslo policy has been released as a stand alone library. This is great,
in that the rules engine is relatively non-applicaition specific, and I
assume that all of the policy based project are planning to migrate over
to using the policy library instead of the incubated version.
Part of the
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
Oslo policy has been released as a stand alone library. This is great, in
that the rules engine is relatively non-applicaition specific, and I assume
that all of the policy based project are planning to migrate over to using
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-03-16 11:10:01 -0400:
Oslo policy has been released as a stand alone library. This is great,
in that the rules engine is relatively non-applicaition specific, and I
assume that all of the policy based project are planning to migrate over
to using
Hi Adam,
For the most part we've been looking at Congress policy as complementary to
Oslo policy, so we haven’t yet tried to incorporate Oslo policy into Congress
(though I did some experiments with that a while back). But looking forward,
it would definitely be convenient if there were some
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2015-03-16 14:17:16 -0400:
On 03/16/2015 01:45 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
All of these are reasons we have so far resisted building a service to
deploy updates to oslo.config's input files, and rely on provisioning
tools to update them.
Have we
On 03/16/2015 02:59 PM, Tim Hinrichs wrote:
Hi Adam,
For the most part we've been looking at Congress policy as complementary to
Oslo policy, so we haven’t yet tried to incorporate Oslo policy into Congress
(though I did some experiments with that a while back). But looking forward,
it
On 03/16/2015 01:45 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
All of these are reasons we have so far resisted building a service to
deploy updates to oslo.config's input files, and rely on provisioning
tools to update them.
Have we consider using normal provisioning tools for pushing out
changes to policy
11 matches
Mail list logo
