On 07/15/2015 05:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote:
Hi Thierry,
Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed
to ask for.
Rectifying:
On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject,
Please see
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2015/keystone.2015-08-11-18.00.html
for vote results.
Cheers,
Morgan
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/15/2015 05:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM,
Adam Young wrote:
On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote:
Hi Thierry,
Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed
to ask for.
Rectifying:
On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would
like to ask for a *Spec Freeze
I am +1 on this SFE.
Dynamic Policy team has been working hard on this and they will for sure
deliver nice features for Liberty.
-- Marek Denis [marek.de...@cern.ch]
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote:
Hi Thierry,
Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed
to ask for.
Rectifying:
On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would
like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty
@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote:
Hi Thierry,
Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask
for.
Rectifying:
On behalf of the team working
mailto:ayo...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:15 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote:
Hi Thierry
: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
So although I am in favor of approving some of this, it isn’t quite clear what
portions of “Dynamic Policy” is being asked for an exception? We need to be
clear exactly what bps we are taking about here, since there is a lot