On 11/21/2016 08:25 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> Just thinking about all the documentation rework that would be necessary…
> Perhaps it just confuses me ;) I think the short term result would be mass
> confusion as we sort out the next iteration of the documentation in this
Andreas,
Just thinking about all the documentation rework that would be necessary…
Perhaps it just confuses me ;) I think the short term result would be mass
confusion as we sort out the next iteration of the documentation in this
structure since the docs are well tested at present and I’m a
On 11/21/2016 07:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2016-11-21 13:24, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Pete,
The main problem with that is publishing docs to docs.oo which would
then confuse the reader even more then they are already confused by
reading our docs ;)
Regards
-steve
From: Pete Birley m
On 2016-11-21 13:24, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Pete,
>
> The main problem with that is publishing docs to docs.oo which would
> then confuse the reader even more then they are already confused by
> reading our docs ;)
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
>
> From: Pete Birley mailto:pete@port.direct>>
>
On 2016-11-21 13:00, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Yup this is a real challenge to sort out properly. I’ve included infra for
> their guidance (thanks people :).
>
> Here is the issue
>
> Each package should include enough docs that it stands alone after a git
> checkout (IMO). We also publis
Pete,
The main problem with that is publishing docs to docs.oo which would then
confuse the reader even more then they are already confused by reading our docs
;)
Regards
-steve
From: Pete Birley mailto:pete@port.direct>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Yup this is a real challenge to sort out properly. I’ve included infra for
their guidance (thanks people :).
Here is the issue
Each package should include enough docs that it stands alone after a git
checkout (IMO). We also publish docs to docs.oo which should IMO contain one
set of docs for
