Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla + BiFrost integration

2016-07-05 Thread Stephen Hindle
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > I'd be cautious about how much of customization we allow. But don't > forget that Kolla itself and BiFrost will be effectively separate. Run > bifrost, run every customization playbook you want on host, run >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla + BiFrost integration

2016-07-04 Thread Michał Jastrzębski
tion as required >> by corporate rules and the like. >> >> >>>actions should be >>>in another role) to prevent confusion. >>> >>>We also have to be careful that kolla doesn't stomp on any non-kolla >>>configuration... >> >> Coul

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla + BiFrost integration

2016-07-04 Thread Stephen Hindle
la currently expects the machines under its > control to be only OpenStack machines, and not have other applications > running on them. > > Hope that was helpful. > > Regards > -steve > >> >> >>On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Mooney, Sean K >><s

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla + BiFrost integration

2016-07-02 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
sean.k.moo...@intel.com> wrote: >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Steven Dake (stdake) [mailto:std...@cisco.com] >>> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 9:21 PM >>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> <opens

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla + BiFrost integration

2016-07-01 Thread Stephen Hindle
com> wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Steven Dake (stdake) [mailto:std...@cisco.com] >> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 9:21 PM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla + BiFrost integration

2016-06-30 Thread Mooney, Sean K
> -Original Message- > From: Steven Dake (stdake) [mailto:std...@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 9:21 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][iron

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla + BiFrost integration

2016-06-27 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
On 6/27/16, 11:19 AM, "Devananda van der Veen" wrote: >At a quick glance, this sequence diagram matches what I >envisioned/expected. > >I'd like to suggest a few additional steps be called out, however I'm not >sure >how to edit this so I'll write them here. > > >As

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla + BiFrost integration

2016-06-27 Thread Devananda van der Veen
At a quick glance, this sequence diagram matches what I envisioned/expected. I'd like to suggest a few additional steps be called out, however I'm not sure how to edit this so I'll write them here. As part of the installation of Ironic, and assuming this is done through Bifrost, the Actor

[openstack-dev] [kolla][ironic] My thoughts on Kolla + BiFrost integration

2016-06-23 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Hey folks, I created the following sequence diagram to show my thinking on Ironic integration. I recognize some internals of the recently merged bifrost changes are not represented in this diagram. I would like to see a bootstrap action do all of the necessary things to bring up BiFrost in a