Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-18 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? To be clear we have two pursuits on this thread: 1) What to rename bay.blatform to. 2) How we

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-16 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 07/16/2015 03:18 PM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? I’d be comfortable with server_type. Adrian

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-16 Thread Jay Lau
From: Hongbin Lu hongbin...@huawei.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 07/16/2015 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-16 Thread Adrian Otto
/198984/6 From: Kai Qiang Wu [mailto:wk...@cn.ibm.com] Sent: July-15-15 10:36 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? Hi HongBin, I think flavors introduces more confusion than

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-16 Thread Hongbin Lu
I am OK with server_type as well. From: Kai Qiang Wu [mailto:wk...@cn.ibm.com] Sent: July-16-15 3:22 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? + 1 about server_type. I also

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-16 Thread Ton Ngo
use platform VS others as a type? I am OK with server_type as well. From: Kai Qiang Wu [mailto:wk...@cn.ibm.com] Sent: July-16-15 3:22 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-16 Thread Fox, Kevin M
...@cn.ibm.com] Sent: July-15-15 10:36 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? Hi HongBin, I think flavors introduces more confusion than nova_instance_type or instance_type

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-16 Thread Adrian Otto
...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8:42 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? Kai, Sorry for the confusion. To clarify, I was thinking how to name the field you proposed

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-16 Thread Fox, Kevin M
: Adrian Otto [adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:35 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? To be clear we have two pursuits on this thread: 1) What

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-16 Thread Adrian Otto
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? Good point. +1 on server_type. it seems reasonable. As for the need, I'd really rather not have my users have to know how to map flavors to server_types themselves. Its something they will get wrong

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-15 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 07/16/2015 04:44 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? +1 for the idea of using Nova flavor

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-15 Thread Hongbin Lu
-15-15 10:36 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? Hi HongBin, I think flavors introduces more confusion than nova_instance_type or instance_type. As flavors not have

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-15 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 07/16/2015 11:47 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? Kai, Sorry for the confusion. To clarify, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-15 Thread Adrian Otto
node to this bay”. Adrian Best regards, Hongbin From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov] Sent: July-15-15 12:37 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? Maybe somehow I

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-15 Thread Hongbin Lu
indicates. Best regards, Hongbin From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov] Sent: July-15-15 12:37 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? Maybe somehow I missed

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-15 Thread Daneyon Hansen (danehans)
@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? One drawback to virt_type if not seen in the context of the acceptable values, is that it should be set to values like libvirt, xen, ironic, etc. That might actually be good. Instead

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-15 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? All, IMO virt_type does not properly describe bare metal deployments. What about using the compute_driver parameter? compute_driver = None (StrOpt) Driver

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-14 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
Hi Magnum Guys, I want to raise this question through ML. In this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200401/ For some old history reason, we use platform to indicate 'vm' or 'baremetal'. This seems not proper for that, @Adrian proposed nova_instance_type, and someone prefer other names,

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-14 Thread Hongbin Lu
/flavor-instance-type-dedup Best regards, Hongbin From: Kai Qiang Wu [mailto:wk...@cn.ibm.com] Sent: July-14-15 9:35 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? Hi Magnum Guys, I want to raise this question

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type?

2015-07-14 Thread Adrian Otto
(not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Magnum template manage use platform VS others as a type? I am going to propose a third option: 3. virt_type I have concerns about option 1 and 2, because “instance_type” and flavor was used