Kirill,
Here's the latest on the Nova freeze concept:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/068079.html
-- dims
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Kirill Zaitsev kzait...@mirantis.com wrote:
We had discussed this (see subj) interesting idea, during our latest meeting
in IRC
(http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2015/murano.2015-07-07-17.01.html)
The idea was borrowed from nova, who froze their specs shortly after L1
release. The reasoning behind this is rather simple, as adding something,
that requires a spec during a 2d half of the cycle, seems like a not so good
idea. Knowing that there would be a spec freeze of some sort, would probably
1) make contributors want to write their specs beforehan
2) make reviewers review specs more often (although I’m not really sure if
there is a good way to encourage spec reviews)
What do you think about such an idea?
Obviously introducing a spec-freeze for liberty (without proper prior
notice) is a bad thing to do. But sounds like a reasonable idea for M cycle.
Somewhere between M-1 and M-2, maybe? What do you think?
--
Kirill Zaitsev
Murano team
Software Engineer
Mirantis, Inc
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
