Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

2017-03-21 Thread Duarte Cardoso, Igor
- True Thanks, Cathy From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com<mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com>] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 8:02 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertio

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

2017-03-21 Thread Vikash Kumar
usage questions) < openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation Hi, Moving definition of SF from port-pair to port-pair-group looks good. TAP is also an insertion mode like L2/L3 but since it simplifies to ke

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

2017-03-21 Thread Vikash Kumar
s, > > Igor. > > > > *From:* Vikash Kumar [mailto:vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 21, 2017 3:32 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

2017-03-21 Thread Henry Fourie
Igor, Inline. -Louis From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 8:02 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

2017-03-21 Thread Duarte Cardoso, Igor
ards, Igor. From: Vikash Kumar [mailto:vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 3:32 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation Hi, Moving definition of SF

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

2017-03-21 Thread Vikash Kumar
- False (default) > > - True > > > > Thanks, > > Cathy > > > > *From:* Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] > *Sent:* Monday, March 20, 2017 8:02 AM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

2017-03-21 Thread Duarte Cardoso, Igor
NSH and (in practice today @ networking-sfc) MPLS, are all mutually exclusive. Best regards, Igor. From: Cathy Zhang [mailto:cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 6:05 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc]

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

2017-03-20 Thread Cathy Zhang
-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation Hi networking-sfc, At the latest IRC meeting [1] it was agreed to split TAP from the possible insertion modes (initial spec version [2]). I took the ARs to propose coexistence of insertion modes, correlation and (now) a new tap

[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

2017-03-20 Thread Duarte Cardoso, Igor
Hi networking-sfc, At the latest IRC meeting [1] it was agreed to split TAP from the possible insertion modes (initial spec version [2]). I took the ARs to propose coexistence of insertion modes, correlation and (now) a new tap-enabled attribute, and send this email about possible directions.