Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

PoolMember should be ok being the same. It just needs to call v1 >>> or v2 depending on if the lb its pointing at is v1 or v2. Is monitor's api >>> different between them? Can it be like pool member? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Kevin >>> >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

and it, loadbalancer in v2 is more like pool was in v1. Can >>>> we make it such that if you are using the loadbalancer resource and have >>>> the mandatory v2 properties that it tries to use v2 api, otherwise its a v1 >>>> resource? PoolMember should be ok being th

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

. > > Thanks, > Kevin > -- > *From:* Sergey Kraynev [skray...@mirantis.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2015 11:09 AM > > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for Lbaas

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

n@pnnl.gov>> wrote: > Seperate ns would work great. > > Thanks, > Kevin > > From: Banashankar KV > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 9:14:35 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

Seperate ns would work great. Thanks, Kevin From: Banashankar KV Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 9:14:35 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2 What you think

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

vin From: Sergey Kraynev [skray...@mirantis.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 11:09 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2 Guys. I happy, that you already discus

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2 > > What you think about separating both of them with the name as Doug > mentioned. In future if we want to get rid of the v1 we can just r

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

> > From: Banashankar KV [banvee...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:07 AM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaa

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2 Hi Brandon, Work in progress, but need some input on the way we want them, like replace the existing lbaasv1 or we still need to support them ? Thanks Banashankar On Tue, Sep 22, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

> Thanks, > Kevin > > __ > From: Banashankar KV [banvee...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:07 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for > Lbaas

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

Hi Banashankar, There's a BP for this https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/support-neutron-lb-v2-model-definition . And I plan to submit a spec for it but I haven't figure out how to implement it. Maybe we can work together with huangtianhua. There are two choices to implement it: 1.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

Hi Brandon, Work in progress, but need some input on the way we want them, like replace the existing lbaasv1 or we still need to support them ? Thanks Banashankar On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Brandon Logan wrote: > Hi Banashankar, > I think it'd be great if

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

Hi Banashankar, I think it'd be great if you got this going. One of those things we want to have and people ask for but has always gotten a lower priority due to the critical things needed. Thanks, Brandon On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 17:57 -0700, Banashankar KV wrote: > Hi All, > I was thinking of

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

Thanks, > > Kevin > > > > > > ____________ > > From: Banashankar KV [banvee...@gm

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

ee...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:40 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for > LbaasV2 > > > > Ok, sounds good. So now the question is how should we name the new

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2 So for the API v1s api is of the structure: /lb/(vip|pool|member|health_monitor) V2s is: /lbaas/(loadbalancer|listener|pool|healthmonitor) member is a child of pool, so it would go down one level. The only difference is the lb for v1

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

re using the v1 resources... >> > >> > If the v2 ones are compatible and can seamlessly upgrade, great >> > >> > Otherwise, make new ones please. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Kevin >> > >> > _______________

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

*To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2 > > So for the API v1s api is of the structure: > > /lb/(vip|pool|member|health_monitor) > > V2s is: > /lbaas/(loadbalancer|listener|pool|healthmonitor)

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

please. > > > > Thanks, > > Kevin > > > > > > __________________ > > From: Banashankar KV

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

> v2 one. This gives a smoothish upgrade path. > > Thanks, > Kevin > > From: Brandon Logan [brandon.lo...@rackspace.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 3:22 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

guessing. Thanks, Kevin From: Banashankar KV [banvee...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:40 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2 Ok, sounds good

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

gt; > > > > __ > > From: Banashankar KV [banvee...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:16 PM > > > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for u

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

; > __________________ > > From: Banashankar KV [banvee...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:07 AM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

. > > Thanks, > Kevin > > -- > *From:* Banashankar KV [banvee...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:16 PM > > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat sup

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

delete the old. > > Thanks, > Kevin > > > __ > From: Banashankar KV [banvee...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:16 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questio

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

; > > Thanks, > > Brandon > > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:38 +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > > > We're using the v1 resources... > > > > > > If the v2 ones are compatible and can seamlessly > > upgrade, great > > > > > > Otherw

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2 But I think, V2 has introduced some new components and whole association of the resources with each other is changed, we should be still able to do what Kevin has mentioned ? Thanks Banashankar On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Fox, Kevin M

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

;] > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:16 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2 > > But I think, V2 has introduced some new components and whole association of > the resources wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

> Thanks, >> Kevin >> >> -- >> *From:* Banashankar KV [banvee...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2015 4:16 PM >> >> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-d

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2 The other option would be to change the namespace. (Os::Lbaas instead of Os::Neutron). The neutron CLI does something similar with neutron-lb-* versus neutron-lbaas-*, e.g. One wrinkle with heat supporting both is that neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

Hi Ethan, Oh thats cool, I didn't see that BP. Sure we can work together on it. As there will be no support for LBaasV1 in Liberty and upcoming releases, I think we can stick to the first approach that you mentioned. But need to discuss whether to have the type named as

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2

Hi All, I was thinking of starting the work on heat to support LBaasV2, Is there any concerns about that? I don't know if it is the right time to bring this up :D . Thanks, Banashankar (bana_k) __ OpenStack Development