+1
I also prefer option 2 in general with slight inclination to 2-B
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Logan [mailto:brandon.lo...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 9:21 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Object statuses
So I am
The example you put implicitly assigns the status tree to a load balancer.
Is sharing only allowed for sub resources? Or can sub resources be shared
across multiple load balancers? If that is the case then I suspect that
statuses may be exposed in many different places correct?
Cheers,
--Jorge
So I am resurrecting this topic now because we put this discussion on a a brief
hold,
but are now discussing it again and need to decide asap. We've all agreed we
need a
provisioning_status and operating_status fields. We now need to decide where to
show
these statuses to the user.
Option 1:
