On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Angus Lees wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:46:33 PM Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Kyle Mestery
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> There are at least two changes [1][2] proposed to N
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:46:33 PM Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Kyle Mestery
>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann
> >
> > wrote:
> >> There are at least two changes [1][2] proposed to Nova that use the new
> >> OverQuotaClient exception in pytho
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Kyle Mestery
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann
> wrote:
>> There are at least two changes [1][2] proposed to Nova that use the new
>> OverQuotaClient exception in python-neutronclient, but the unit test jobs no
>> longer test against trunk-
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> There are at least two changes [1][2] proposed to Nova that use the new
> OverQuotaClient exception in python-neutronclient, but the unit test jobs no
> longer test against trunk-level code of the client packages so they fail.
> So I'm here
There are at least two changes [1][2] proposed to Nova that use the new
OverQuotaClient exception in python-neutronclient, but the unit test
jobs no longer test against trunk-level code of the client packages so
they fail. So I'm here to lobby for a new release of
python-neutronclient if possi
