Hi,

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:28:05PM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Haïkel <hgue...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> 
> >2016-04-01 16:17 GMT+02:00 Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com>:
> >>Haïkel <hgue...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Do we want to raise those issues to networking vendors? Do we have a
> >>list of
> >>what’s required from them for RDO?
> >>
> >>Ihar
> >
> >Yes, we need to raise their attention about this issue.
> >
> >As a distribution, it would help if they do proper releases (from
> >higher to lesser priority)
> >* tagged releases
> >* stable branches
> >* tarballs uploaded
> >
> >Bare minimum is tagging releases and documented compatibility against
> >neutron releases, as our CI can't test these backends features.
> >
> >Regards,
> >H.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> it seems that RDO project needs networking-* subprojects to create
> stable/mitaka branches, tag releases from there, and upload tarballs to
> pypi, to be able to consume the code for those projects.
> 
> I presume it’s not just RDO, but other distributions that are interested in
> it.

Yes. For SUSE we are tracking the stable tarballs from
tarballs.openstack.org . But not all projects have yet a stable branch
which produce a stable tarball.

[snipped]

Cheers,

Tom

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to