Armando M. wrote:
On 3 November 2015 at 08:49, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that
maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe
that in lots of cases it w
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that
> maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe
> that in lots of cases it would b
On 3 November 2015 at 08:49, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that
> maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe
> that in lots of cases it would be b
5:24 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per
sub-project stable-maint teams?
From: "mest...@mestery.com<mailto:mest...@mestery.com>"
mailto:me
t;>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per
sub-project stable-maint teams?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com>> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
currently we have a single neutron-wide stab
This plan makes a lot of sense to me.
With the staggering number of sub-projects in neutron it is impossible for
the stable team to cope with the load. Delegation and decentralisation is a
must and both sub-project maintainers and the stable team will benefit from
it.
Also, since patches can always
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that
> maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe
> that in lots of cases it would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that
maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe
that in lots of cases it would be better to have subproject members to
run their own stable maintenance