Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that > maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe > that in

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

Armando M. wrote: On 3 November 2015 at 08:49, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that maintains all stable branches for all stadium

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

On 3 November 2015 at 08:49, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that > maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe > that in lots

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

09 PM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams? On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com<

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

v@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 5:24 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project sta

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

This plan makes a lot of sense to me. With the staggering number of sub-projects in neutron it is impossible for the stable team to cope with the load. Delegation and decentralisation is a must and both sub-project maintainers and the stable team will benefit from it. Also, since patches can

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that > maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe > that in

[openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe that in lots of cases it would be better to have subproject members to run their own stable