Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 04/04/2016 23:20, Carl Baldwin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Doug Wiegley > wrote: >> I don’t know, -1 really means, “there is something wrong, the submitter >> should fix it and clear the slate.” Whereas -2 has two meanings. The first >> is “procedural block”, and the second is “f

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote: > I don’t know, -1 really means, “there is something wrong, the submitter > should fix it and clear the slate.” Whereas -2 has two meanings. The first > is “procedural block”, and the second is “f*** you.” > > I really don’t see a reason not to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Armando M. wrote: > > > > On 4 April 2016 at 09:22, Ihar Hrachyshka > wrote: > Armando M. mailto:arma...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka > wrote: > Hi all, > > I no

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 04/04/2016 11:41 AM, Armando M. wrote: On 4 April 2016 at 09:36, Ihar Hrachyshka > wrote: Graham mailto:graham.ha...@hpe.com>> wrote: On 04/04/2016 17:11, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, I noticed that often times we go an

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

One of these patchsets was mine, so I feel qualified to send a response :) On 04/04/2016 12:06 PM, Armando M. wrote: On 4 April 2016 at 09:51, Ihar Hrachyshka > wrote: Doug Wiegley mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com>> wrote: On Apr 4, 2016, at 10

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 4 April 2016 at 09:51, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Doug Wiegley wrote: > > On Apr 4, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >>> >>> Armando M. wrote: >>> >>> On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in t

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

Doug Wiegley wrote: On Apr 4, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Armando M. wrote: On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is alle

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 4 April 2016 at 09:36, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Graham wrote: > > On 04/04/2016 17:11, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review >>> queue >>> on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly done >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 4 April 2016 at 09:22, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Armando M. wrote: > > >> >> On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review >> queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly >> d

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Armando M. wrote: > >> >> >> On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue >> on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

Graham wrote: On 04/04/2016 17:11, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly done to make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate until we fix

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

Armando M. wrote: On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly done to make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 04/04/2016 17:11, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue > on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly done to > make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate until we fix > the breaka

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 4 April 2016 at 09:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review > queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly > done to make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate until > we fix the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

On 04/04/2016 12:01 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review > queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly > done to make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate > until we fix the br

[openstack-dev] [neutron] -2'ing all patches on every gate breakage

Hi all, I noticed that often times we go and -2 all the patches in the review queue on every neutron specific gate breakage spotted. This is allegedly done to make sure that nothing known to be broken land in merge gate until we fix the breakage on our side. While I share the goal of not