Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-05 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
gt; > > > From: Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> > Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Monday, April 3, 2017 at 3:14 PM > > > To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-04 Thread Gary Kotton
ck.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade I worked with Gary on IRC and discovered that we aren't making use of the flag added in [1], which makes adoption harder. I've proposed a patch to neutron-lib[2] that should alleviate some of these issues. 1. https://bugs.launchpa

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-04 Thread Kevin Benton
Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> > *Reply-To: *OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Date: *Monday, April 3, 2017 at 3:14 PM > > > *To: *OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade > > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-04 Thread Anna Taraday
*From: *Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com> *Reply-To: *OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> *Date: *Monday, April 3, 2017 at 3:14 PM *To: *OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade Hi, We needed to m

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-04 Thread Gary Kotton
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade Hi! I'm a little confused change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/452539/ is about switching for new facade, does the master branch fails the same? On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:35 AM Gary Kotton <gkot.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-03 Thread Gary Kotton
rg> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade Hi! I'm a little confused change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/452539/ is about switching for new facade, does the master branch fails the same? On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:35 AM Gary Kotton <gkot...@vmware.com<mailto:gkot...@vmware.co

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-03 Thread Anna Taraday
v@lists.openstack.org> > *Date: *Monday, April 3, 2017 at 12:56 AM > *To: *OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade > > > > Do you have a link to a traceback? > > > > On Apr 2, 2017 09:25, &

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-02 Thread Gary Kotton
stack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: Monday, April 3, 2017 at 12:56 AM To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade Do you have a link to a traceback? On Apr 2, 2017 09:25, "Gary Kotton" <gkot...@vmware.com<mai

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-02 Thread Kevin Benton
Do you have a link to a traceback? On Apr 2, 2017 09:25, "Gary Kotton" wrote: > Hi, > > The change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402750/ has broken the > vmware-nsx plugin. I am not sure if this has had effect on any other > decomposed plugins. > > One of the issues that

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Engine facade

2017-04-02 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, The change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402750/ has broken the vmware-nsx plugin. I am not sure if this has had effect on any other decomposed plugins. One of the issues that we have is when we create a PortDNS object under a transaction we get an exception: DBReferenceError: