On Aug 26, 2014, at 5:06 PM, Pradeep Kilambi (pkilambi) pkila...@cisco.com
wrote:
On 8/26/14, 4:49 AM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 25, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Pradeep Kilambi (pkilambi)
pkila...@cisco.com wrote:
On 8/23/14, 5:36 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
.
Best regards.
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
发件人: Maru Newby [ma...@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2014年9月1日 17:53
收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging
perspective
On Aug
be introduced when the the incubation
graduate.
Best regards.
Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )
发件人: Maru Newby [ma...@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2014年9月1日 17:53
收件人: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator
above reasonable?
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
-邮件原件-
发件人: Robert Kukura [mailto:kuk...@noironetworks.com]
发送时间: 2014年9月1日 22:37
收件人: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging perspective
Sure, Horizon (or Heat) support
of Horizon.
Is the logical above reasonable?
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
-邮件原件-
发件人: Robert Kukura [mailto:kuk...@noironetworks.com]
发送时间: 2014年9月1日 22:37
收件人: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging
perspective
?
From: Kevin Benton [blak...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 9:55 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging
perspective
Is it possible to have a /contrib folder
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from
packaging perspective
Is it possible to have a /contrib folder or something similar where
experimental modules can be placed? Requiring a separate Horizon
distribution for every project
On 08/21/2014 03:12 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
I wonder where discussion around the proposal is running. Is it public?
Yes, it's public, and this thread is part of it. Look at the dates of
the wiki: this is a recent proposal (first appearance Aug 11), came out
to address the GBP issue, quickly
On Aug 25, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Pradeep Kilambi (pkilambi) pkila...@cisco.com
wrote:
On 8/23/14, 5:36 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 23, 2014, at 4:06 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
On 8/26/14, 4:49 AM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 25, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Pradeep Kilambi (pkilambi)
pkila...@cisco.com wrote:
On 8/23/14, 5:36 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 23, 2014, at 4:06 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Luke Gorrie l...@tail-f.com wrote:
On 21 August 2014 12:12, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Let the ones that are primarily interested in
good quality of that code (vendors) to drive development. And if some
plugins become garbage, it's bad news
On 8/23/14, 5:36 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 23, 2014, at 4:06 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Aug 23, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 23, 2014, at 4:06 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
+1
I agree with Pradeep and Doug that a new namespace makes for a better
structure for packaging and usage.
Regards,
Mandeep
-
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Aug 23, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Aug 23,
On 21 August 2014 12:12, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Let the ones that are primarily interested in
good quality of that code (vendors) to drive development. And if some
plugins become garbage, it's bad news for specific vendors; if neutron
screws because of lack of
On Aug 23, 2014, at 4:06 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 20/08/14
On Aug 20, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 20 August 2014 17:38, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
I've read the proposal for incubator as described
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 20/08/14 18:28, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 20 August
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com
wrote:
Some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 20 August 2014 17:38, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
I've read the proposal for incubator as described
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 20/08/14 18:28, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 20 August 2014 17:38, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've read the proposal for incubator as described at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 21/08/14 08:33, loy wolfe wrote:
It's also unfair that core team reviewers are forced to spend
time on 3rd plugins and drivers under existing process. There are
so many 3rd networking backend technologies, from hardware to
controller, anyone
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 20/08/14 18:28, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 20 August 2014 17:38, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
I've read the proposal for incubator as described at [1], and I have
several comments/concerns/suggestions to this.
Overall, the idea of giving some space for experimentation that does
not alienate parts of community from Neutron is good.
Some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 20 August 2014 17:38, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
I've read the proposal for incubator as described at [1], and I have
several comments/concerns/suggestions to this.
Overall, the
24 matches
Mail list logo