Hi Akihito,
I think from the requirements.txt point of view, we are good.
Thanks
-Sukhdev
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Hi Sukhdev, Dave,
>
> I think this backport is acceptable.
>
> In Kilo release, neutron is in a middle way of splitting vendor codes
> to separat
Hi Sukhdev, Dave,
I think this backport is acceptable.
In Kilo release, neutron is in a middle way of splitting vendor codes
to separate repositories.
The master fix is available at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/309622/ and
as far as I checked, stable/kilo fix are split into two parts:
- netwo
Hi Dave,
I will get on it right away. Let me find Neutron Cores to review it.
Please stand by
-Sukhdev
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Dave Walker wrote:
>
>
> On 4 May 2016 at 17:55, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
>
>> Hi Stable Maintainers,
>>
>> We have a critical bug impacting customers producti
On 4 May 2016 at 17:55, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> Hi Stable Maintainers,
>
> We have a critical bug impacting customers production network. This is a
> minor fix.
> I would like to request an exception so that the customers do not have to
> baby
> sit this patch.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c
On 4 May 2016 at 17:55, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> Hi Stable Maintainers,
>
> We have a critical bug impacting customers production network. This is a
> minor fix.
> I would like to request an exception so that the customers do not have to
> baby
> sit this patch.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c
