Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stable review

2018-07-12 Thread Brian Haley
On 07/12/2018 02:53 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: hi, queens branch of networking-midonet has had no changes merged since its creation. the following commit would tell you how many gate blockers have been accumulated. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572242/ it seems the stable team doesn't have

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stable review

2018-07-12 Thread Boden Russell
On 7/12/18 4:10 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: >> >> No we need more contributors to stable and extended maintenance periods. >> This is not a new problem, and one we're trying to correct. > > actually it is a new problem. at least worse than

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stable review

2018-07-12 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 03:53:22PM +0900, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: >> hi, >> >> queens branch of networking-midonet has had no changes merged since >> its creation. >> the following commit would tell you how many gate blockers have been >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stable review

2018-07-12 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 03:53:22PM +0900, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > hi, > > queens branch of networking-midonet has had no changes merged since > its creation. > the following commit would tell you how many gate blockers have been > accumulated. > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572242/ > > it

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Stable review

2018-07-12 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
hi, queens branch of networking-midonet has had no changes merged since its creation. the following commit would tell you how many gate blockers have been accumulated. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572242/ it seems the stable team doesn't have a bandwidth to review subprojects in a timely

[openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] Review request

2014-11-18 Thread Carol Bouchard (caboucha)
Neutron cores: I submitted a bug fix a bit over a month ago which is waiting for one more core (+2) review. The changes are rather simple which affects the ovs/ofa code. Could a core person take the time to review? Here are the pointers to the changes: https://review.openstack.org/127654