See @PCM in-line…
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL p...@cisco.com
IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net)
TW @pmichali
On Oct 12, 2013, at 5:04 PM, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> > I was wondering in general how providers can customize service features,
> > based on their capabilities (better or wor
Thanks for the responses Nachi! I combined them into one message. See @PCM
inline…
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL p...@cisco.com
IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net)
TW @pmichali
On Oct 11, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> 2013/10/11 Paul Michali :
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have a bunch o
Hi folks,
> I was wondering in general how providers can customize service features,
> based on their capabilities (better or worse than reference). I could
create
> a Summit session topic on this, but wanted to know if this is something
that
> has already been addressed or if a different architec
Hi Paul
2013/10/11 Paul Michali :
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a bunch of questions for you on VPNaaS in specific, and services in
> general...
>
> Nachi,
>
> 1) You hd a bug fix to do service provider framework support for VPN
> (41827). It was held for Icehouse. Is that pretty much a working patch?
>
Hi folks,
I have a bunch of questions for you on VPNaaS in specific, and services in
general...
Nachi,
1) You hd a bug fix to do service provider framework support for VPN (41827).
It was held for Icehouse. Is that pretty much a working patch?
2) When are you planning on reopening the review?
