.
>>
>> What steps are necessary to promote these APIs beyond experimental?
>>
>> - Jack
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Mark McClain [mailto:mmccl...@yahoo-inc.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:07 AM
>>> To: Ope
gt;
> - Jack
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark McClain [mailto:mmccl...@yahoo-inc.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 11:07 AM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] status of
gt; Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] status of VPNaaS and FWaaS APIs in
> Icehouse
>
>
> On Apr 23, 2014, at 6:20 PM, McCann, Jack wrote:
>
> > Are VPNaaS and FWaaS APIs still considered experimental in Icehouse?
> >
> > For VPNaaS, [1] says "This
On Apr 23, 2014, at 6:20 PM, McCann, Jack wrote:
> Are VPNaaS and FWaaS APIs still considered experimental in Icehouse?
>
> For VPNaaS, [1] says "This extension is experimental for the Havana release."
> For FWaaS, [2] says "The Firewall-as-a-Service (FWaaS) API is an experimental
> API…"
Th
Are VPNaaS and FWaaS APIs still considered experimental in Icehouse?
For VPNaaS, [1] says "This extension is experimental for the Havana release."
For FWaaS, [2] says "The Firewall-as-a-Service (FWaaS) API is an experimental
API..."
Thanks,
- Jack
[1] http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-ne
