Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Do we need to rfe to implement active-active router?

Hi Assaf I already file a RFE bug, please check bug#1645625. Any comment is welcome. 发自网易邮箱手机版 On 2016-11-17 01:32 , Assaf Muller Wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:42 AM, huangdenghui wrote: > hi > Currently, neutron support DVR router and legacy router. For high

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Do we need to rfe to implement active-active router?

Hi Thomas I have already filed a RFE bug.Please refer to bug #1645625 发自网易邮箱手机版 On 2016-11-18 01:27 , Thomas Morin Wrote: Hi, What would active-active exactly be in DVR mode ? -Thomas Le 16/11/2016 à 16:42, huangdenghui a écrit : hi Currently, neutron support DVR router and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Do we need to rfe to implement active-active router?

Hi, What would active-active exactly be in DVR mode ? -Thomas Le 16/11/2016 à 16:42, huangdenghui a écrit : hi Currently, neutron support DVR router and legacy router. For high availability, there is HA router in reference implementation of legacy mode and DVR mode. I am considering

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Do we need to rfe to implement active-active router?

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:42 AM, huangdenghui wrote: > hi > Currently, neutron support DVR router and legacy router. For high > availability, there is HA router in reference implementation of legacy mode > and DVR mode. I am considering whether is active-active router

[openstack-dev] [neutron]Do we need to rfe to implement active-active router?

hi Currently, neutron support DVR router and legacy router. For high availability, there is HA router in reference implementation of legacy mode and DVR mode. I am considering whether is active-active router needed in both mode?