Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-15 Thread Yuriy Taraday
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Jamie Lennox wrote: > > > And as we're going to have to live with this for a while, I'd rather use > > the more clear version of this in keystone instead of the Heat stanzas. > > Anyone else have an opinion on this? > I like keeping sections' names simple and cle

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-12 Thread Jamie Lennox
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 19:52 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/11/2014 07:47 PM, Jamie Lennox wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:13 +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > >> On 12/06/14 08:18, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:57 +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > On 11/06/14 15:07, Jamie Len

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-12 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On 2014-06-12, 7:18 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 06/11/2014 08:12 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: On 2014-06-11, 7:52 PM, Sean Dague wrote: I'm concerned about the [nova] section being (one day) overloaded with options unrelated to the actual nova client configuration. Although my concern could be wrong.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-12 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/11/2014 08:12 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: > On 2014-06-11, 7:52 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> Honestly, I really like >> >> [nova] >> >> better than >> >> [clients_nova] >> >> And as we're going to have to live with this for a while, I'd rather use >> the more clear version of this in keystone ins

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-11 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On 2014-06-11, 7:52 PM, Sean Dague wrote: Honestly, I really like [nova] better than [clients_nova] And as we're going to have to live with this for a while, I'd rather use the more clear version of this in keystone instead of the Heat stanzas. What about [novaclient] or [nova_client] ?

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-11 Thread Jamie Lennox
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 04:43 +, Angus Salkeld wrote: > On 11/06/14 13:10, Jamie Lennox wrote: > > Among the problems cause by the inconsistencies in the clients is that > > all the options that are required to create a client need to go into the > > config file of the service. This is a pain to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-11 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/11/2014 07:47 PM, Jamie Lennox wrote: > On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:13 +1200, Steve Baker wrote: >> On 12/06/14 08:18, Mark McLoughlin wrote: >>> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:57 +1200, Steve Baker wrote: On 11/06/14 15:07, Jamie Lennox wrote: > Among the problems cause by the inconsistencie

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-11 Thread Jamie Lennox
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:13 +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > On 12/06/14 08:18, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:57 +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > >> On 11/06/14 15:07, Jamie Lennox wrote: > >>> Among the problems cause by the inconsistencies in the clients is that > >>> all the options

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-11 Thread Steve Baker
On 12/06/14 08:18, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:57 +1200, Steve Baker wrote: >> On 11/06/14 15:07, Jamie Lennox wrote: >>> Among the problems cause by the inconsistencies in the clients is that >>> all the options that are required to create a client need to go into the >>> con

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-11 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:57 +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > On 11/06/14 15:07, Jamie Lennox wrote: > > Among the problems cause by the inconsistencies in the clients is that > > all the options that are required to create a client need to go into the > > config file of the service. This is a pain to co

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-10 Thread Steve Baker
On 11/06/14 15:07, Jamie Lennox wrote: > Among the problems cause by the inconsistencies in the clients is that > all the options that are required to create a client need to go into the > config file of the service. This is a pain to configure from the server > side and can result in missing optio

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-10 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/06/14 13:10, Jamie Lennox wrote: > Among the problems cause by the inconsistencies in the clients is that > all the options that are required to create a client need to go into the > config file of the service. This is a pain to configure from th

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][ceilometer][glance][all] Loading clients from a CONF object

2014-06-10 Thread Jamie Lennox
Among the problems cause by the inconsistencies in the clients is that all the options that are required to create a client need to go into the config file of the service. This is a pain to configure from the server side and can result in missing options as servers fail to keep up. With the sessio