Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][barbican][kite][requirements] pycrypto vs pycryptodome

2016-02-16 Thread Robert Collins
I suggest: - pin anything that moves - start being strict ourselves to prepare for moving - work with paramiko to help them move Sadly Python doesn't have either-or dependencies as yet, so we're going to be in the position of having to override pip for some time during the migration process.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][barbican][kite][requirements] pycrypto vs pycryptodome

2016-02-16 Thread Beliveau, Ludovic
[mailto:dava...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 5:16 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][barbican][kite][requirements] pycrypto vs pycryptodome Hi, Short Story: pycryptodome if installed inadvertently will break

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][barbican][kite][requirements] pycrypto vs pycryptodome

2016-02-15 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Douglas, Which means we should make sure pysaml2 and paramiko do switch to the " pyca/cryptography" ASAP. However, what do we do in the mean time? -- Dims On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Douglas Mendizábal wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][barbican][kite][requirements] pycrypto vs pycryptodome

2016-02-15 Thread Douglas Mendizábal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 One more thing: I forgot to point out that pyca/cryptography is already part of global-requirements. [1] - - Douglas Mendizábal [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/global-require ments.txt#n25 On 2/15/16 12:24 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][barbican][kite][requirements] pycrypto vs pycryptodome

2016-02-15 Thread Douglas Mendizábal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I had not previously heard of pycryptodome. Is this supposed to be a drop-in replacement for pycrypto? If so then it sounds like they're doing a terrible job of it. The plan for Barbican has been to wait for pyca/cryptography [1] to add support

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][barbican][kite][requirements] pycrypto vs pycryptodome

2016-02-15 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 14/02/16 17:16 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Hi, Short Story: pycryptodome if installed inadvertently will break several projects: Example : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/279926/ Long Story: There's a new kid in town pycryptodome: https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome Because

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][barbican][kite][requirements] pycrypto vs pycryptodome

2016-02-15 Thread Haïkel
2016-02-14 23:16 GMT+01:00 Davanum Srinivas : > Hi, > > Short Story: > pycryptodome if installed inadvertently will break several projects: > Example : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/279926/ > > Long Story: > There's a new kid in town pycryptodome: >

[openstack-dev] [nova][glance][barbican][kite][requirements] pycrypto vs pycryptodome

2016-02-14 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Hi, Short Story: pycryptodome if installed inadvertently will break several projects: Example : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/279926/ Long Story: There's a new kid in town pycryptodome: https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome Because pycrypto itself has not been maintained for a while: