[openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Minimum VC version
Hi, We would like to indicate that we do not support versions below 5.1.0 of the VC. Is anyone aware of people using versions below with OpenStack. Patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/183711/ proposes exiting Nova compute if a lower version is used. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Minimum VC version
On 5/15/2015 4:50 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, We would like to indicate that we do not support versions below 5.1.0 of the VC. Is anyone aware of people using versions below with OpenStack. Patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/183711/ proposes exiting Nova compute if a lower version is used. Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Cross-posting to the operators mailing list. Also note the kilo docs mention supporting less than 5.0: http://docs.openstack.org/kilo/config-reference/content/vmware.html But 4.x was EOL over a year ago: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=2039567 Also note that the NSX CI (vmware CI) originally ran with vcenter 5.1 and is now running 5.5. -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Minimum VC version
But 4.x was EOL over a year ago: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=2039567 ...and was released in 2010. We're supporting a minimum version of libvirt from 2014, so I think that dropping support for five-year-old EOL'd VMware is good. We don't test it, which means it's probably broken. I also feel like this is a thing we can do without a deprecation cycle, assuming there aren't a ton of users still using unsupported commercial software out there. --Dan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
