Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 2016-04-05 00:45:20 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: > The proposal is to have the hardware companies donate hardware and > sysadmins to setup and maintain a *single* third-party CI lab > environment running the *upstream infra CI toolset* in one > datacenter at first, moving to multiple

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 04/04/2016 08:45 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-04-04 20:06:03 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: I'm really not sure why you are being so hostile to my proposal. Essentially, I wanted to involve the upstream Infra team in this so they can advise on the project and ensure that the 3rd party

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 2016-04-04 20:06:03 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: > I'm really not sure why you are being so hostile to my proposal. > Essentially, I wanted to involve the upstream Infra team in this > so they can advise on the project and ensure that the 3rd party CI > system that gets built matches what is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 04/04/2016 06:56 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-04-04 13:54:34 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: On 03/30/2016 11:00 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 26 March 2016 at 09:08, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-03-25 15:20:00 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: [...] 3) The upstream

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 2016-04-04 13:54:34 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: > On 03/30/2016 11:00 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > >On 26 March 2016 at 09:08, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >>On 2016-03-25 15:20:00 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: > >>[...] > >>>3) The upstream Infrastructure team works with

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 03/30/2016 11:00 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 26 March 2016 at 09:08, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-03-25 15:20:00 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: [...] 3) The upstream Infrastructure team works with the hired system administrators to create a single CI system that can

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

>-Original Message- >From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com] >Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 3:27 PM >To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures >missed a regression, why? > &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 26 March 2016 at 09:08, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-25 15:20:00 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: > [...] >> 3) The upstream Infrastructure team works with the hired system >> administrators to create a single CI system that can spawn >> functional test jobs on the lab

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 03/29/2016 08:56 AM, Znoinski, Waldemar wrote: > Hi Jay, Matt, Levi et al, > > The Intel NFV CI problems were fixed last week. > Also, I think if the CIs would have voting right it would attract more > attention. > > I'd be happy to work with OpenStack Infra team on getting our NFV CI the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

Hi Jay, Matt, Levi et al, The Intel NFV CI problems were fixed last week. Also, I think if the CIs would have voting right it would attract more attention. I'd be happy to work with OpenStack Infra team on getting our NFV CI the voting level/rights. To do it right, though, it'd be great to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 03/25/2016 03:52 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-03-25 16:33:44 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: [...] What I'm proposing isn't using or needing a custom OpenStack deployment. There's nothing non-standard at all about the PCI or NFV stuff besides the hardware required to functionally test

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 2016-03-25 16:33:44 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: [...] > What I'm proposing isn't using or needing a custom OpenStack > deployment. There's nothing non-standard at all about the PCI or > NFV stuff besides the hardware required to functionally test it. What you _are_ talking about though is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 03/25/2016 04:08 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-03-25 15:20:00 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: [...] 3) The upstream Infrastructure team works with the hired system administrators to create a single CI system that can spawn functional test jobs on the lab hardware and report results back

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] The same SRIOV / NFV CI failures missed a regression, why?

On 2016-03-25 15:20:00 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: [...] > 3) The upstream Infrastructure team works with the hired system > administrators to create a single CI system that can spawn > functional test jobs on the lab hardware and report results back > to upstream Gerrit [...] This bit is