86
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ed Leafe [mailto:e...@leafe.com]
>Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 10:59 AM
>To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
>"Gantt" for discussing about Nova scheduler
>
&
lvain
> --
> Don Dugger
> "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
> Ph: 303/443-3786
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Leafe [mailto:e...@leafe.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 10:59 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re:
: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
"Gantt" for discussing about Nova scheduler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/03/2015 11:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
> Yes the current effort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/03/2015 11:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
> Yes the current effort is to clean up the scheduler interfaces but
> one of the main goals of that clean up is to make it possible to
> then split out the scheduler to a separate project. I don't wa
On 04/03/2015 12:59 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On 04/03/2015 11:42 AM, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
>
>> Yes the current effort is to clean up the scheduler interfaces but
>> one of the main goals of that clean up is to make it possible to
>> then split out the scheduler to a separate project. I don't want
il 2, 2015 4:22 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
"Gantt" for discussing about Nova scheduler
Gantt is a dead and abandoned source tree, it also means nothing to new people
joining into helping with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/02/2015 03:10 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
> As a meeting is by definition a synchronous thing, should we maybe
> try to async that decision using Gerrit ? I could pop up a
> resolution in Gerrit so that people could -1 or +1 it.
To me, 'Gantt' r
tory,
>> ideally as a cross-project service. It will just translate the
>> reality, ie. that Gantt is at the moment more an idea than a project.
>>
>> -Sylvain
>>
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Don Dugger
>>> "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse d
786
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 1:49 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
"Gantt" for discussing about N
ailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using
"Gantt" for discussing about Nova scheduler
Le 31/03/2015 02:57, Dugger, Donald D a écrit :
> I actually prefer to use the term Gantt, it neatly encapsulates the
> disc
.@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 8:17 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using "Gantt"
for discussing about Nova scheduler
Hi,
tl;dr: I used the [gantt] tag for this e-mail, but I
86
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 8:17 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] [gantt] Please stop using "Gantt"
for discussing about Nova sched
Hi,
tl;dr: I used the [gantt] tag for this e-mail, but I would prefer if we
could do this for the last time until we spin-off the project.
As it is confusing for many people to understand the difference in
between the future Gantt project and the Nova scheduler effort we're
doing, I'm propo
13 matches
Mail list logo
