Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

2014-01-11 Thread Michael Still
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Another question. This patch [1] failed turbo-hipster after it was approved but I don't know if that's a gating or just voting job, i.e. should someone do 'reverify migrations' on that patch or just let it sit

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

2014-01-11 Thread Michael Still
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: [snip] So instead of trying to fix the individual runs, because t-h runs pretty fast, can you just fix it with bulk. It seems like the issue in a migration taking a long time isn't a race in OpenStack, it's completely

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

2014-01-11 Thread Michael Still
Please note that turbo-hipster currently has -1 voting disabled while we work through these issues. +1 voting is still enabled though. Michael On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: [snip] So

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

2014-01-10 Thread Robert Collins
On 9 January 2014 07:05, Samuel Merritt s...@swiftstack.com wrote: On 1/7/14 2:53 PM, Michael Still wrote: So applying migration 206 took slightly over a minute (67 seconds). Our historical data (mean + 2 standard deviations) says that this migration should take no more than 63 seconds. So

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

2014-01-09 Thread Dan Prince
- Original Message - From: Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 5:53:01 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

2014-01-08 Thread Matt Riedemann
On Tuesday, January 07, 2014 4:53:01 PM, Michael Still wrote: Hi. Thanks for reaching out about this. It seems this patch has now passed turbo hipster, so I am going to treat this as a more theoretical question than perhaps you intended. I should note though that Joshua Hesketh and I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

2014-01-08 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/08/2014 09:48 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Another question. This patch [1] failed turbo-hipster after it was approved but I don't know if that's a gating or just voting job, i.e. should someone do 'reverify migrations' on that patch or just let it sit and ignore turbo-hipster? [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

2014-01-08 Thread Samuel Merritt
On 1/7/14 2:53 PM, Michael Still wrote: Hi. Thanks for reaching out about this. It seems this patch has now passed turbo hipster, so I am going to treat this as a more theoretical question than perhaps you intended. I should note though that Joshua Hesketh and I have been trying to read /

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

2014-01-07 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 12/30/2013 6:21 AM, Michael Still wrote: Hi. The purpose of this email to is apologise for some incorrect -1 review scores which turbo hipster sent out today. I think its important when a third party testing tool is new to not have flakey results as people learn to trust the tool, so I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Bogus -1 scores from turbo hipster

2014-01-07 Thread Michael Still
Hi. Thanks for reaching out about this. It seems this patch has now passed turbo hipster, so I am going to treat this as a more theoretical question than perhaps you intended. I should note though that Joshua Hesketh and I have been trying to read / triage every turbo hipster failure, but that