Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration

2017-05-22 Thread Mike Bayer
<mailto:mriede...@gmail.com>] Sent: 19 May 2017 5:21 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration

2017-05-22 Thread Sean Dague
On 05/22/2017 05:39 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: > Aside: For a query operation, what's the better user experience when a > single cell is failing: > > 1. The whole query fails. > 2. The user gets incomplete results. > > Either of these are simple to implement. Incomplete results would also >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration

2017-05-22 Thread Belmiro Moreira
d sort at the same time (may >>> not provide exactly the result end user want) if searchlight should not be >>> integrated. >>> >>> In fact in Tricircle, when query ports from neutron where tricircle >>> central plugin is installed, the tricircle cent

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration

2017-05-22 Thread Matthew Booth
tegrated. >> >> In fact in Tricircle, when query ports from neutron where tricircle >> central plugin is installed, the tricircle central plugin do the similar >> cross local Neutron ports query, and not support pagination/sort together. >> >> Best Regards >> Chaoyi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration

2017-05-19 Thread Mike Bayer
___ From: Matt Riedemann [mriede...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 May 2017 5:21 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration Hi everyone, After previous summits where we had vertical tracks for Nova sessions

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration

2017-05-19 Thread Dean Troyer
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Since sorting instances across cells is the main issue, it was also > suggested that we allow a config option to disable sorting in the API. It > was stated this would be without a microversion, and filtering/paging

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration

2017-05-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 5/19/2017 1:46 AM, joehuang wrote: Support sort and pagination together will be the biggest challenge: it's up to how many cells will be involved in the query, 3,5 may be OK, you can search each cells, and cached data. But how about 20, 50 or more, and how many data will be cached? More

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration

2017-05-19 Thread joehuang
] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration Hi everyone, After previous summits where we had vertical tracks for Nova sessions I would provide a recap for each session. The Forum in Boston was a bit different, so here I'm only attempting to recap the Forum sessions that I

[openstack-dev] [nova] Boston Forum session recap - searchlight integration

2017-05-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
Hi everyone, After previous summits where we had vertical tracks for Nova sessions I would provide a recap for each session. The Forum in Boston was a bit different, so here I'm only attempting to recap the Forum sessions that I ran. Dan Smith led a session on Cells v2, John Garbutt led