Thank you for information !
So, you mean the situation is not changed from the reference thread[1]
in qemu-devel ML 3 years ago, and the difficulties of ivshmem you
mentioned is described in this thread. Am I right?
[1] "[Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem"
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:38:38AM +0100, sfinu...@redhat.com wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 13:23 +0900, TETSURO NAKAMURA wrote:
> > Hi Nova team,
> >
> > I'm writing this e-mail because I'd like to have a discussion about
> > DPDK support at OpenStack Summit in Boston.
> >
> > We have
Thank you for reply!
On 2017/04/28 4:38, sfinu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 13:23 +0900, TETSURO NAKAMURA wrote:
Hi Nova team,
I'm writing this e-mail because I'd like to have a discussion about
DPDK support at OpenStack Summit in Boston.
We have developed a dpdk-based patch
On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 13:23 +0900, TETSURO NAKAMURA wrote:
> Hi Nova team,
>
> I'm writing this e-mail because I'd like to have a discussion about
> DPDK support at OpenStack Summit in Boston.
>
> We have developed a dpdk-based patch panel named SPP[1], and we'd
> like to start working on
] [nova] Discussions for DPDK support in OpenStack
Hi Nova team,
I'm writing this e-mail because I'd like to have a discussion about DPDK
support at OpenStack Summit in Boston.
We have developed a dpdk-based patch panel named SPP[1], and we'd like to start
working on Openstack (ML2 driver
Hi Nova team,
I'm writing this e-mail because I'd like to have a discussion about DPDK
support at OpenStack Summit in Boston.
We have developed a dpdk-based patch panel named SPP[1], and we'd like
to start working on Openstack (ML2 driver) to develop "networking-spp".
Especially, we'd
