Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feedback for upcoming user survey questionnaire

2016-12-28 Thread Balazs Gibizer 



On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Matt Riedemann 
 wrote:
We have the opportunity to again [1] ask a question in the upcoming 
user survey which will be conducted in February. We can ask one 
question and have it directed to either *users* of Nova, people 
*testing* nova, or people *interested* in using/adopting nova. Given 
the existing adoption of Nova in OpenStack deployments (98% as of 
October 2016) I think that sliding scale really only makes sense to 
direct a question at existing users of the project. It's also 
suggested that for projects with over 50% adoption to make the 
question quantitative rather than qualitative.


We have until January 9th to submit a question. If you have any 
quantitative questions about Nova to users, please reply to this 
thread before then.


Personally I tend to be interested in feedback on recent development, 
so I'd like to ask questions about cells v2 or the placement API, 
i.e. they were optional in Newton but how many deployments that have 
upgraded to Newton are deploying those features (maybe also noting 
they will be required to upgrade to Ocata)? However, the other side 
of me knows that most major production deployments are also lagging 
behind by a few releases, and may only now be upgrading, or planning 
to upgrade, to Mitaka since we've recently end-of-life'd the Liberty 
release. So asking questions about cells v2 or the placement service 
is probably premature. It might be better to ask about microversion 
adoption, i.e. if you're monitoring API request traffic to your 
cloud, what % of compute API requests are using a microversion > 2.1.


Previous release priorities might spur some other ideas [2].

[1] 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-September/103396.html

[2] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/#priorities

--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


I would like to ask about notifications if possible:

Do you consume (or plan to consume) nova notifications in your 
deployment? Have you heard about the versioned notifications? Do you 
consume (or plan to consume) versioned notifications?


Cheers,
gibi





__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feedback for upcoming user survey questionnaire

2016-12-27 Thread Rui Chen 
I have one to users:

- Have you need to add some customized features on upstream Nova code to
meet your special needs? or Nova is out of the box project?

Thanks.

2016-12-27 7:18 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes :

> On 12/26/2016 06:08 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>> We have the opportunity to again [1] ask a question in the upcoming user
>> survey which will be conducted in February. We can ask one question and
>> have it directed to either *users* of Nova, people *testing* nova, or
>> people *interested* in using/adopting nova. Given the existing adoption
>> of Nova in OpenStack deployments (98% as of October 2016) I think that
>> sliding scale really only makes sense to direct a question at existing
>> users of the project. It's also suggested that for projects with over
>> 50% adoption to make the question quantitative rather than qualitative.
>>
>> We have until January 9th to submit a question. If you have any
>> quantitative questions about Nova to users, please reply to this thread
>> before then.
>>
>> Personally I tend to be interested in feedback on recent development, so
>> I'd like to ask questions about cells v2 or the placement API, i.e. they
>> were optional in Newton but how many deployments that have upgraded to
>> Newton are deploying those features (maybe also noting they will be
>> required to upgrade to Ocata)? However, the other side of me knows that
>> most major production deployments are also lagging behind by a few
>> releases, and may only now be upgrading, or planning to upgrade, to
>> Mitaka since we've recently end-of-life'd the Liberty release. So asking
>> questions about cells v2 or the placement service is probably premature.
>> It might be better to ask about microversion adoption, i.e. if you're
>> monitoring API request traffic to your cloud, what % of compute API
>> requests are using a microversion > 2.1.
>>
>
> My vote would be to ask the following question:
>
> Have you considered using (or already chosen) an alternative to OpenStack
> Nova for launching your software workloads? If you have, please list one to
> three reasons why you chose this alternative.
>
> Thanks,
> -jay
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feedback for upcoming user survey questionnaire

2016-12-26 Thread Jay Pipes 

On 12/26/2016 06:08 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:

We have the opportunity to again [1] ask a question in the upcoming user
survey which will be conducted in February. We can ask one question and
have it directed to either *users* of Nova, people *testing* nova, or
people *interested* in using/adopting nova. Given the existing adoption
of Nova in OpenStack deployments (98% as of October 2016) I think that
sliding scale really only makes sense to direct a question at existing
users of the project. It's also suggested that for projects with over
50% adoption to make the question quantitative rather than qualitative.

We have until January 9th to submit a question. If you have any
quantitative questions about Nova to users, please reply to this thread
before then.

Personally I tend to be interested in feedback on recent development, so
I'd like to ask questions about cells v2 or the placement API, i.e. they
were optional in Newton but how many deployments that have upgraded to
Newton are deploying those features (maybe also noting they will be
required to upgrade to Ocata)? However, the other side of me knows that
most major production deployments are also lagging behind by a few
releases, and may only now be upgrading, or planning to upgrade, to
Mitaka since we've recently end-of-life'd the Liberty release. So asking
questions about cells v2 or the placement service is probably premature.
It might be better to ask about microversion adoption, i.e. if you're
monitoring API request traffic to your cloud, what % of compute API
requests are using a microversion > 2.1.


My vote would be to ask the following question:

Have you considered using (or already chosen) an alternative to 
OpenStack Nova for launching your software workloads? If you have, 
please list one to three reasons why you chose this alternative.


Thanks,
-jay

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [nova] Feedback for upcoming user survey questionnaire

2016-12-26 Thread Matt Riedemann 
We have the opportunity to again [1] ask a question in the upcoming user 
survey which will be conducted in February. We can ask one question and 
have it directed to either *users* of Nova, people *testing* nova, or 
people *interested* in using/adopting nova. Given the existing adoption 
of Nova in OpenStack deployments (98% as of October 2016) I think that 
sliding scale really only makes sense to direct a question at existing 
users of the project. It's also suggested that for projects with over 
50% adoption to make the question quantitative rather than qualitative.


We have until January 9th to submit a question. If you have any 
quantitative questions about Nova to users, please reply to this thread 
before then.


Personally I tend to be interested in feedback on recent development, so 
I'd like to ask questions about cells v2 or the placement API, i.e. they 
were optional in Newton but how many deployments that have upgraded to 
Newton are deploying those features (maybe also noting they will be 
required to upgrade to Ocata)? However, the other side of me knows that 
most major production deployments are also lagging behind by a few 
releases, and may only now be upgrading, or planning to upgrade, to 
Mitaka since we've recently end-of-life'd the Liberty release. So asking 
questions about cells v2 or the placement service is probably premature. 
It might be better to ask about microversion adoption, i.e. if you're 
monitoring API request traffic to your cloud, what % of compute API 
requests are using a microversion > 2.1.


Previous release priorities might spur some other ideas [2].

[1] 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-September/103396.html

[2] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/#priorities

--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev