On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Matt Riedemann wrote:
What's really baffling to me is when I'm in the hallway with you and Matt
Booth and others talking about this stuff face to face in person, and
explaining my side of the issue, and I'm listening to yours, we seem to all
be nodding our heads and agreei
On 11/10/2016 6:15 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Chris Friesen wrote:
That said, I don't know that there's an easy solution to this in nova
due to the fact that it's a distributed system with a central shared
data store. Enhancing a sched filter might require new data, which
means m
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Chris Friesen wrote:
That said, I don't know that there's an easy solution to this in nova due to
the fact that it's a distributed system with a central shared data store.
Enhancing a sched filter might require new data, which means modifying the DB
model and the DB migrati
On 11/08/2016 12:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I'd also like to say that I dislike the constant comparisons to the kernel. If
people are going to make that comparison, then let's say the kernel overall is
all of OpenStack, and there are subsystems, like nova/cinder/glance/etc, with
their own subs
On Nov 8, 2016 1:13 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote:
>
> On 11/8/2016 11:39 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> I do imagine, however, that most folks who have been working
>>> on nova for long enough have a list of domain experts in their heads
>>> already. Would actually putting that on paper really hurt?
>
On 11/8/2016 11:39 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
I do imagine, however, that most folks who have been working
on nova for long enough have a list of domain experts in their heads
already. Would actually putting that on paper really hurt?
You mean like this?
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova#Develope
> I do imagine, however, that most folks who have been working
> on nova for long enough have a list of domain experts in their heads
> already. Would actually putting that on paper really hurt?
You mean like this?
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova#Developer_Contacts
Those are pretty much the
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 11:50 +, Matthew Booth wrote:
> I'd like to follow up on the discussions we had in Barcelona around
> review cadence. I took a lot away from these discussions, and I
> thought they were extremely productive. I think the summary of the
> concerns was:
>
> Nova is a compl
I'd like to follow up on the discussions we had in Barcelona around review
cadence. I took a lot away from these discussions, and I thought they were
extremely productive. I think the summary of the concerns was:
Nova is a complex beast, very few people know even most of it well.
There are are
