Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 12:35 -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 2/10/2017 11:18 AM, Thomas Bechtold wrote: > > > > For SUSE the wiki is updated and 1.2.9 should be fine. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Tom > > > > Thanks Tom. > > Would 1.3.1 as the next minimum in Queens be acceptable for SUSE? Yes. Cheers, Tom __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
On 2/10/2017 11:18 AM, Thomas Bechtold wrote: For SUSE the wiki is updated and 1.2.9 should be fine. Cheers, Tom Thanks Tom. Would 1.3.1 as the next minimum in Queens be acceptable for SUSE? -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
Hi, On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 17:29 -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Since danpb hasn't been around I've sort of forgotten about this, but > we > should talk about bumping the minimum required libvirt version in > nova. > > Currently it's 1.2.1 and the next was set to 1.2.9. > > On master we're gating on ubuntu 14.04 which has libvirt 1.3.1 > (14.04 > had 1.2.2). > > If we move to require 1.2.9 that effectively kills 14.04 support for > devstack + libvirt on master, which is probably OK. > > There is also the distro support wiki [1] which hasn't been updated > in > awhile. For SUSE the wiki is updated and 1.2.9 should be fine. Cheers, Tom __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:29:22PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> Since danpb hasn't been around I've sort of forgotten about this, but we
> should talk about bumping the minimum required libvirt version in nova.
>
> Currently it's 1.2.1 and the next was set to 1.2.9.
>
> On master we're gating on ubuntu 14.04 which has libvirt 1.3.1 (14.04 had
> 1.2.2).
>
> If we move to require 1.2.9 that effectively kills 14.04 support for
> devstack + libvirt on master, which is probably OK.
>
> There is also the distro support wiki [1] which hasn't been updated in
> awhile.
>
> I'm wondering if 1.2.9 is a safe move for the next required minimum version
> and if so, does anyone have ideas on the next required version after that?
1.2.9 was release on OCT 2014.
And there have been 26 releases from 1.2.9 until now:
1.2.{10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21}
1.3.{0,1,2,3,4,5}
2.0.0 [01 JUL 2016]
2.1.0 [02 AUG 2016]
2.2.0 [02 SEP 2016]
2.3.0 [04 OCT 2016]
2.4.0 [01 NOV 2016]
2.5.0 [04 DEC 2016]
3.0.0 [17 JAN 2017]
3.1.0 [Unreleased, as of 10-FEB-2017]
IIUC, going by how[X] Dan settled on 1.1.1, as minimum version for
Newton, it seems like have to mine through the current releases,
that'll:
- provide unconditional support for specific features we need;
- removes need for maintaining backward compatibility code
[X]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-October/008400.html
---
Good news for future: Upstream libvirt recently started an effort to
make release notes more consumable, by writing more 'structured' release
notes, and categorizing the work into: new Features; improvements; and
bug fixes.
You can see the result by comparing this page:
http://libvirt.org/news.html
With the older releases (where it's mostly information from Git
commits):
http://libvirt.org/news-2016.html
[...]
--
/kashyap
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
On 02/09/2017 05:51 PM, Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Matt Riedemann" <mriede...@gmail.com> >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, >> openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org >> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 6:29:22 PM >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version >> >> Since danpb hasn't been around I've sort of forgotten about this, but we >> should talk about bumping the minimum required libvirt version in nova. >> >> Currently it's 1.2.1 and the next was set to 1.2.9. >> >> On master we're gating on ubuntu 14.04 which has libvirt 1.3.1 (14.04 >> had 1.2.2). >> >> If we move to require 1.2.9 that effectively kills 14.04 support for >> devstack + libvirt on master, which is probably OK. > > This would also kill off RHEL/CentOS 7.1 support but that would also seem to > be OK at this point. Our distro support policy is to at minimum support latest Ubuntu LTS and latest RHEL. I think given that it's more than fine for us to drop support for 14.04 and RHEL 7.1 in master. >> There is also the distro support wiki [1] which hasn't been updated in >> awhile. > > I've added the details I have for Fedora 25 and RHEL/CentOS 7.3, TL;DR: > > Fedora 25: > Libvirt 2.2.0 > Qemu 2.7.1 > Libguestfs 1.34.3 > > RHEL 7.3: > Libvirt 2.0.0 > Qemu 2.6.0 > Libguestfs 1.32.7 So I think, sadly, that means: Libvirt: 1.3.1 Qemu: 2.5 Libguestfs: 1.32.3 Which are all the Xenial versions and what we're testing in the gate (and older than the RHEL or Fedora versions) FWIW, Yakkety has: Libvirt: 2.1.0 Qemu: 2.6.1 Libguestfs: 1.32.7 so progress does seem to be being made there. > >> I'm wondering if 1.2.9 is a safe move for the next required minimum >> version and if so, does anyone have ideas on the next required version >> after that? >> >> I'm hoping some of the Red Hat people can chime in here. > > I just play someone intelligent on TV so adding Sahid and Vladik who might be > better placed to comment in Dan's absence. > > Thanks, > > Steve > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
- Original Message - > From: "Matt Riedemann" <mriede...@gmail.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, > openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org > Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 6:29:22 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version > > Since danpb hasn't been around I've sort of forgotten about this, but we > should talk about bumping the minimum required libvirt version in nova. > > Currently it's 1.2.1 and the next was set to 1.2.9. > > On master we're gating on ubuntu 14.04 which has libvirt 1.3.1 (14.04 > had 1.2.2). > > If we move to require 1.2.9 that effectively kills 14.04 support for > devstack + libvirt on master, which is probably OK. This would also kill off RHEL/CentOS 7.1 support but that would also seem to be OK at this point. > There is also the distro support wiki [1] which hasn't been updated in > awhile. I've added the details I have for Fedora 25 and RHEL/CentOS 7.3, TL;DR: Fedora 25: Libvirt 2.2.0 Qemu 2.7.1 Libguestfs 1.34.3 RHEL 7.3: Libvirt 2.0.0 Qemu 2.6.0 Libguestfs 1.32.7 > I'm wondering if 1.2.9 is a safe move for the next required minimum > version and if so, does anyone have ideas on the next required version > after that? > > I'm hoping some of the Red Hat people can chime in here. I just play someone intelligent on TV so adding Sahid and Vladik who might be better placed to comment in Dan's absence. Thanks, Steve -- Steve Gordon, Principal Product Manager, Red Hat OpenStack Platform __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [nova] Next minimum libvirt version
Since danpb hasn't been around I've sort of forgotten about this, but we should talk about bumping the minimum required libvirt version in nova. Currently it's 1.2.1 and the next was set to 1.2.9. On master we're gating on ubuntu 14.04 which has libvirt 1.3.1 (14.04 had 1.2.2). If we move to require 1.2.9 that effectively kills 14.04 support for devstack + libvirt on master, which is probably OK. There is also the distro support wiki [1] which hasn't been updated in awhile. I'm wondering if 1.2.9 is a safe move for the next required minimum version and if so, does anyone have ideas on the next required version after that? I'm hoping some of the Red Hat people can chime in here. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
