I normally do this in one big batch, but haven't had a chance yet. I'll do
that later this week.
Michael
On 17 Mar 2016 7:50 AM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote:
> Specs are proposed to the 'approved' subdirectory and when they are
> completely implemented in launchpad (the blueprint status is
> 'Impleme
Matt Riedemann wrote on 03/16/2016 09:49:06
PM:
> From: Matt Riedemann
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Date: 03/16/2016 09:50 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move implemented nova
> specs from mitaka
&g
Specs are proposed to the 'approved' subdirectory and when they are
completely implemented in launchpad (the blueprint status is
'Implemented'), we should move the spec from the 'approved' subdirectory
to the 'implemented' subdirectory in the nova-specs repo.
For example:
https://review.opens
Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM wrote on 03/18/2016 11:46:01 AM:
> From: Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
>
> Date: 03/18/2016 11:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move implemented
On 3/16/2016 4:20 PM, Michael Still wrote:
I normally do this in one big batch, but haven't had a chance yet. I'll
do that later this week.
Michael
On 17 Mar 2016 7:50 AM, "Matt Riedemann" mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
Specs are proposed to the 'approved' subdirectory and wh
Matt Riedemann wrote on 03/18/2016 03:20:23
PM:
> From: Matt Riedemann
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Date: 03/18/2016 03:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move implemented nova
> specs from mitaka
>
>
>
> On 3/18/2016 5:
On 3/18/2016 5:46 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote:
Matt Riedemann wrote on 03/16/2016 09:49:06
PM:
From: Matt Riedemann
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: 03/16/2016 09:50 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder to move implemented nova
specs f
