Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Clint,
>
> Pike may be too soon :) as we need to make sure what we have in
> oslo.rootwrap/oslo.privsep work properly in py35. I saw some stuff i
> am still chasing.
>
> So the one after next will have my vote.
Yes, I'd like us to make enough progress during Pike that
Clint,
Pike may be too soon :) as we need to make sure what we have in
oslo.rootwrap/oslo.privsep work properly in py35. I saw some stuff i
am still chasing.
So the one after next will have my vote.
-- Dims
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-01-26 10:08:52 +0100:
> Michael Still wrote:
> > I think #3 is the right call for now. The person we had working on
> > privsep has left the company, and I don't have anyone I could get to
> > work on this right now. Oh, and we're out of time.
>
>
26-Jan-17 12:08, Thierry Carrez пишет:
Michael Still wrote:
I think #3 is the right call for now. The person we had working on
privsep has left the company, and I don't have anyone I could get to
work on this right now. Oh, and we're out of time.
Yes, as much as I'm an advocate of privsep
Michael Still wrote:
> I think #3 is the right call for now. The person we had working on
> privsep has left the company, and I don't have anyone I could get to
> work on this right now. Oh, and we're out of time.
Yes, as much as I'm an advocate of privsep adoption, I don't think the
last minutes
I think #3 is the right call for now. The person we had working on privsep
has left the company, and I don't have anyone I could get to work on this
right now. Oh, and we're out of time.
Michael
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> The patch to add
The patch to add support for ephemeral storage with the Virtuozzo config
is using the privsep helper from os-brick to run a new ploop command as
root:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312488/
I've objected to this because I'm pretty sure this is not how we
intended to be using privsep in