Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-29 Thread Gary Kotton
@lists.openstack.org, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 10:37:27 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:47:30PM +0100, Vladik Romanovsky wrote: I think it was: ceilometer sample-list -m cpu_util -q 'resource_id

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-20 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
(not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 10:37:27 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:47:30PM +0100, Vladik Romanovsky wrote: I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:56:47PM +0400, Oleg Gelbukh wrote: Hi everyone, I'm sorry for being late to the thread, but what about baremetal driver? Should it support the get_diagnostics() as well? Of course, where practical, every driver should aim to support every method in the virt driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-20 Thread Matt Riedemann
On Friday, December 20, 2013 3:57:15 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:56:47PM +0400, Oleg Gelbukh wrote: Hi everyone, I'm sorry for being late to the thread, but what about baremetal driver? Should it support the get_diagnostics() as well? Of course, where

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-20 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Matt, My understanding is that there will be a nova.virt.baremetal.ironic driver in Nova which will talk to Ironic API to manage bare-metal instances. So, Ironic will be actually providing the diagnostics data about bm instance via its API eventually. Hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread John Garbutt
On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: I'd like to propose the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Vladik Romanovsky
@lists.openstack.org Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 9:34:02 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Vladik Romanovsky
, 2013 9:34:02 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 9:34:02 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:50, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics. The proposal is backwards compatible and will hopefully provide us with the tools to be able to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Gary Kotton
On 12/19/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://wiki.openstack.org/wik

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Gary Kotton
On 12/19/13 6:07 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:02:16AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: On 12/19/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Following the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:02:16AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: On 12/19/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:28:30AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-19 Thread Vladik Romanovsky
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 10:37:27 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:47:30PM +0100, Vladik Romanovsky wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-17 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics. The proposal is backwards compatible and will hopefully provide us with the tools to be able to troubleshoot VM issues. Thanks Gary On 12/16/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P.

[openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-16 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, At the moment the administrator is able to retrieve diagnostics for a running VM. Currently the implementation is very loosely defined, that is, each driver returns whatever they have to return. This is problematic in a number of respects: 1. The tempest tests were written specifically

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, At the moment the administrator is able to retrieve diagnostics for a running VM. Currently the implementation is very loosely defined, that is, each driver returns whatever they have to return. This is problematic in a number

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-16 Thread John Garbutt
On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, At the moment the administrator is able to retrieve diagnostics for a running VM. Currently the implementation is very loosely defined, that is, each

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +, John Garbutt wrote: On 16 December 2013 15:25, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: I'd like to propose the following for the V3 API (we will not touch V2 in case operators have

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VM diagnostics - V3 proposal

2013-12-16 Thread Gary Kotton
On 12/16/13 5:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:58:24AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, At the moment the administrator is able to retrieve diagnostics for a running VM. Currently the implementation is very loosely defined, that is, each driver