I think that both ways of doing this should be supported.
Decorated private methods make sense if the different microversions
have nicely interchangeable bits of functionality but not if one of
the private methods would have to be a no-op. A method which just
passes is noise. Additionally there ha
2015-03-16 12:26 GMT+08:00 Christopher Yeoh :
> So ultimately I think this is a style issue rather than a technical one. I
> think there
> are situations where one way looks clearer than another the other way
> does. Sorry I can't get around to putting up a couple of examples,
> ATM but to be clea
not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 03/16/2015 02:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] is it possible to microversion a
> static class method?
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> 2015-03-16 9:48 GMT+08:00
[openstack-dev] [nova] is it possible to microversion a
static class method?
2015-03-16 9:48 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu :
2015-03-13 19:10 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague :
On 03/13/2015 02:55 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 12:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 03/12/2
So ultimately I think this is a style issue rather than a technical one. I
think there
are situations where one way looks clearer than another the other way does.
Sorry I can't get around to putting up a couple of examples,
ATM but to be clear there is no difference in the end result (no different
2015-03-16 9:48 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu :
>
>
> 2015-03-13 19:10 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague :
>
>> On 03/13/2015 02:55 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> > On 03/12/2015 12:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> >> On 03/12/2015 02:03 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm having an issue with microversions.
>>
2015-03-13 19:10 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague :
> On 03/13/2015 02:55 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > On 03/12/2015 12:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> >> On 03/12/2015 02:03 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'm having an issue with microversions.
> >>>
> >>> The api_version() code has a comment sayi
On 03/13/2015 02:55 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 12:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 03/12/2015 02:03 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm having an issue with microversions.
>>>
>>> The api_version() code has a comment saying "This decorator MUST appear
>>> first (the outermost d
Park, Haidian District,
Beijing 100193, PRC
From: Chris Friesen
To:
Date: 03/13/2015 07:57 AM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] is it possible to microversion a
static class method?
On 03/12/2015 12:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 02:03 PM, Chris
On 03/12/2015 12:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/12/2015 02:03 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
Hi,
I'm having an issue with microversions.
The api_version() code has a comment saying "This decorator MUST appear
first (the outermost decorator) on an API method for it to work correctly"
I tried making
2015-03-13 2:13 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague :
> On 03/12/2015 02:03 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm having an issue with microversions.
> >
> > The api_version() code has a comment saying "This decorator MUST appear
> > first (the outermost decorator) on an API method for it to work
> correc
, PRC
From: Sean Dague
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/12/2015 07:16 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] is it possible to microversion a
static class method?
On 03/12/2015 02:03 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having an issue with micr
On 03/12/2015 02:03 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having an issue with microversions.
>
> The api_version() code has a comment saying "This decorator MUST appear
> first (the outermost decorator) on an API method for it to work correctly"
>
> I tried making a microversioned static class
Hi,
I'm having an issue with microversions.
The api_version() code has a comment saying "This decorator MUST appear first
(the outermost decorator) on an API method for it to work correctly"
I tried making a microversioned static class method like this:
@wsgi.Controller.api_version("2.4"
14 matches
Mail list logo
