On 10/07/2015 06:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:32:53AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
>> The following review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171098 attempts to
>> raise the minimum libvirt version to 1.0.3.
>>
>> In May that was considered a no go -
>> http://lists.opens
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:32:53AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> The following review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171098 attempts to
> raise the minimum libvirt version to 1.0.3.
>
> In May that was considered a no go -
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-May/007012.h
The following review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171098 attempts to
raise the minimum libvirt version to 1.0.3.
In May that was considered a no go -
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-May/007012.html
Can we reconsider that decision and up this to 1.2 for what we're