Hey Sergey,
In-line comments below:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Sergey Guenender wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen, please find my reply next to your points below.
>
> Thank you,
> -Sergey.
>
>
> On 01/06/2016 20:23, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
> > Hey Sergey--
> >
> > Apologies for the delay in my respons
> Hi Sergey, Welcome to working on Octavia!
Thanks, glad to be joining! :^)
Please read a further explanation of my proposal down below.
> I'm not sure I fully understand your proposals, but I can give my
> thoughts/opinion on the challenge for Active/Active.
>
> In general I agree with Stephen
Hi Stephen, please find my reply next to your points below.
Thank you,
-Sergey.
On 01/06/2016 20:23, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
> Hey Sergey--
>
> Apologies for the delay in my response. I'm still wrapping my head
> around your option 2 suggestion and the implications it might have for
> the code
Stephen, Michael, thank you for having a look.
I'll respond to every issue you mentioned when I get to work on Sunday.
Until then, in case you don't mind inspecting a small diff, just to
clarify my point, please have a look at a rather straightforward change,
which
1. exemplifies pretty much al
Hi Sergey, Welcome to working on Octavia!
I'm not sure I fully understand your proposals, but I can give my
thoughts/opinion on the challenge for Active/Active.
In general I agree with Stephen.
The intention of using TaskFlow is to facilitate code reuse across
similar but different code flows.
Hey Sergey--
Apologies for the delay in my response. I'm still wrapping my head around
your option 2 suggestion and the implications it might have for the code
base moving forward. I think, though, that I'm against your option 2
proposal and in favor of option 1 (which, yes, is more work initially
I'm working with the IBM team implementing the Active-Active N+1 topology
[1].
I've been commissioned with the task to help integrate the code supporting
the new topology while a) making as few code changes and b) reusing as
much code as possible.
To make sure the changes to existing code are