Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync

2013-12-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/09/2013 05:18 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:11 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-09 10:55, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800: On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync

2013-12-09 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800: On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote: Hello, Sean. I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update config unless one is

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync

2013-12-09 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800: On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800: On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote: Hello, Sean. I get the

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync

2013-12-09 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800: On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800: On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync

2013-12-09 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-12-09 10:55, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800: On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800:

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync

2013-12-09 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 11:11 -0600, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-09 10:55, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/09/2013 11:38 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-09 08:17:45 -0800: On 12/06/2013 05:40 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync (was: creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?)

2013-12-06 Thread Sean Dague
So it still seems that we are at an impasse here on getting new olso lockutils into cinder because it doesn't come with a working default. As a recap - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48935/ (that sync) is blocked by failing upgrade testing, because lock_path has no default, so it has to land

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync (was: creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?)

2013-12-06 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-06 09:47:03 -0800: So it still seems that we are at an impasse here on getting new olso lockutils into cinder because it doesn't come with a working default. As a recap - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48935/ (that sync) is blocked by failing

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync (was: creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?)

2013-12-06 Thread Yuriy Taraday
Hello, Sean. I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update config unless one is forced to do so. But introducing code that weakens security and let it stay is an unconditionally bad idea. It looks like we have to weigh two evils: having troubles upgrading and lessening security.

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync (was: creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?)

2013-12-06 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote: Hello, Sean. I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update config unless one is forced to do so. But introducing code that weakens security and let it stay is an unconditionally bad idea. It looks like we have to weigh

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync (was: creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?)

2013-12-06 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800: On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote: Hello, Sean. I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update config unless one is forced to do so. But introducing code that weakens security and let it

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] [cinder] upgrade issues in lock_path in cinder after oslo utils sync (was: creating a default for oslo config variables within a project?)

2013-12-06 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-12-06 16:30, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2013-12-06 13:38:16 -0800: On 2013-12-06 15:14, Yuriy Taraday wrote: Hello, Sean. I get the issue with upgrade path. User doesn't want to update config unless one is forced to do so. But introducing code that