-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/16/2015 05:08 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 03:29 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> Working on upstream gate stability obviously does not invalidate
>> any effort to introduce distribution CI votes in gerrit, and I
>> would be happy to
On 07/16/2015 03:29 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Working on upstream gate stability obviously does not invalidate any
> effort to introduce distribution CI votes in gerrit, and I would be
> happy to see RDO or Ubuntu meaningfully voting on backports. It's my
> belief though that distribution CI vot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/16/2015 03:06 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> What we discussed was that distributions would run their own CI
> and validate patches away from upstream CI, then we would agree on
> a patch and share it.
>
That's fine. I think a good start would b
On 07/15/2015 12:37 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> On 07/14/2015 09:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 07/14/2015 10:29 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>> On 07/14/2015 12:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I missed this announce...
>>>
On 07/02/2015 05:32 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Per the Iceh
On 07/15/2015 12:05 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> The "cost" of keeping stable branches around without CI is more a
> branding cost than a technical cost, I think.
Which is why I suggested to rename the branches, if it poses a problem.
For example eol/icehouse would have been fine.
> An OpenStack u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/14/2015 09:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/14/2015 10:29 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> On 07/14/2015 12:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> I missed this announce...
>>
>>> On 07/02/2015 05:32 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
Per the Icehouse
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/14/2015 10:29 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> On 07/14/2015 12:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Effectively, under these conditions, I am giving up doing any kind
>>> of coordination between distros for security patches of Icehouse.
>>> :(
>>
>> As far as I know, there w
On 07/14/2015 10:29 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> On 07/14/2015 12:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> I missed this announce...
>
>> On 07/02/2015 05:32 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>>> Per the Icehouse EOL discussion[1] last month, now that the
>>> final 2014.1.5 release[2] is behind us I have followed
On 07/14/2015 03:55 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2015-07-14 00:33:52 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
> [...]
>> I believe I asked you about 10 times to keep these branches alive, so
>> that distributions could work together on a longer support, even without
>> a CI behind it.
>
> And the pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/14/2015 12:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I missed this announce...
>
> On 07/02/2015 05:32 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> Per the Icehouse EOL discussion[1] last month, now that the
>> final 2014.1.5 release[2] is behind us I have followed our
On 2015-07-14 00:33:52 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
> I believe I asked you about 10 times to keep these branches alive, so
> that distributions could work together on a longer support, even without
> a CI behind it.
And the project consensus has seemed to disagree with this after
ca
I missed this announce...
On 07/02/2015 05:32 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Per the Icehouse EOL discussion[1] last month, now that the final
> 2014.1.5 release[2] is behind us I have followed our usual end of
> life steps for stable/icehouse branches on repos under the control
> of the OpenStack Re
12 matches
Mail list logo
