Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Security hardening backport to Liberty desirable?

2016-03-14 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 7 March 2016 at 14:25, Major Hayden wrote: > > That seems reasonable. Would it be appropriate to add some documentation > in the Liberty release that explains how to enable the role with that > release? > Yes, I think that's a perfectly reasonable thing to do.

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Security hardening backport to Liberty desirable?

2016-03-07 Thread Major Hayden
On 03/05/2016 06:40 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > Liberty is a stable branch and the Mitaka release is just around the corner. > I think it's a bit late in the game to add it. Consider, also, that deployers > can easily consume the role with their own playbook to execute it if they > would like

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Security hardening backport to Liberty desirable?

2016-03-05 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 4 March 2016 at 16:50, Major Hayden wrote: > Hey folks, > > I have proposed a review[1] which adds the openstack-ansible-security[2] > role to OpenStack-Ansible's Liberty release. I would really appreciate > some feedback from deployers on whether this change is desirable in

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] Security hardening backport to Liberty desirable?

2016-03-04 Thread Major Hayden
Hey folks, I have proposed a review[1] which adds the openstack-ansible-security[2] role to OpenStack-Ansible's Liberty release. I would really appreciate some feedback from deployers on whether this change is desirable in Liberty. The role applies cleanly to Liberty on Ubuntu 14.04 and the