st (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Friday, 26 June 2015 19:04
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [neutron]
Are you fine removing voting rights to all Cis?
Edgar
From: Salvatore Orlando
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 7:59 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [o
> Edgar
>
> From: Salvatore Orlando
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> Date: Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 7:59 AM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack
"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [neutron] Third Party CI Voting
On 25 June 2015 at 16:08, John Davidge (jodavidg)
mailto:jodav...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Recent neutron third party CI issues have got
vidge (jodavidg)"
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 7:08 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [neutron] Third Party CI Voting
Hi,
I agree, and only vote +1 myself, but I don’t agree on mandating it. If someone
has invested enough in their CI to be confident, we just supply rope.
Thanks,
doug
> On Jun 25, 2015, at 8:08 AM, John Davidge (jodavidg)
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Recent neutron third party CI issues have g
On 25 June 2015 at 16:08, John Davidge (jodavidg)
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recent neutron third party CI issues have got me thinking again about a
> topic which we discussed in Vancouver:
>
> Should any Third Party CI have voting rights for neutron patches in
> gerrit?
>
Why should this be a deci
Hi all,
Recent neutron third party CI issues have got me thinking again about a topic
which we discussed in Vancouver:
Should any Third Party CI have voting rights for neutron patches in gerrit?
I’d like to suggest that they shouldn’t.
A -1 from a third party CI tool can often be an indication
