OSprofiler.
>>>
>>> For tail-based and adaptive sampling, it is another story.
>>>
>>> However, in naïve way, we can use sampling abilities from other
>>> OpenTracing compatible tracers
>>>
>>> such as Uber Jaeger, Appdash, Zipkin (ha
[1] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/mitak
>> a/osprofiler-cross-service-project-profiling.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Vinh Nguyen Trong
>>
>> PODC – Fujitsu Vietnam Ltd.
>>
>>
>>
>
itaka/osprofiler-cross-service-project-profiling.html
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Vinh Nguyen Trong
>
> PODC – Fujitsu Vietnam Ltd.
>
>
>
> *From:* Rajul Kumar [mailto:kumar.r...@husky.neu.edu]
> *Sent:* Friday, 04 August, 2017 03:49
> *To:* OpenStack
t;
> *From:* Rajul Kumar [mailto:kumar.r...@husky.neu.edu]
> *Sent:* Friday, 04 August, 2017 03:49
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-base
usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling
in OSProfiler
Hi Boris
That is a point of concern.
Can you please direct to any of those?
Anyways, we don't have anything in place for OpenStack yet.
Now, either we pick another tracing sol
Hi Boris
That is a point of concern.
Can you please direct to any of those?
Anyways, we don't have anything in place for OpenStack yet.
Now, either we pick another tracing solution like Zipkin, Jaeger etc. which
have their own limitations OR enhance OSProfiler.
We pick the later as it's most nati
Rajul,
May I ask why you think so?
Exposed by OSprofiler issues are going to be really hard to fix in current
OpenStack architecture.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Rajul Kumar
wrote:
> Hi Boris
>
> Good to hear from you.
> May I ask why you think so?
>
> We do
Hi Boris
Good to hear from you.
May I ask why you think so?
We do see some potential with OSProfiler for this and further objectives.
Thanks
Rajul
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> Rajul,
>
> It makes sense! However, maybe it's a bit too late... ;)
>
> Best regards,
> Bo
Rajul,
It makes sense! However, maybe it's a bit too late... ;)
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Rajul Kumar
wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> I have added a blueprint on having tail-based sampling as a sampling
> option for continuous tracing in OSProfiler. It would be
Hello everyone
I have added a blueprint on having tail-based sampling as a sampling option
for continuous tracing in OSProfiler. It would be really helpful to have
some thoughts, ideas, comments on this from the community.
Continuous tracing provides a good insight on how various transactions
beh
10 matches
Mail list logo
